Wednesday, December 01, 2004

Educators, Scientists and religious people speak out against Intelligent Design

In addition to the more than 500 Steves in NCSE's Project Steve many other scientists have started to speak out against Intelligent Design.
To appreciate the number, there are about 1% of people in the US with the name Steve or Stephanie. In addition, less than 1% of the population in the US has a PhD.
The NCSE has collected the position of Civil Liberty organizations, Educational organizations, Religious organizations and Scientific and Scholarly organizations in their Voices for Evolution project.




National Organizations


National Science Teachers Association


The National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) strongly supports the position
that evolution is a major unifying concept in science and should be included in the K-12 science education frameworks and curricula. Furthermore, if evolution is not taught, students will not achieve the level of scientific literacy they need. This position is consistent with that of the National Academies, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), and many other scientific and educational organizations.
NSTA also recognizes that evolution has not been emphasized in science curricula in a manner commensurate to its importance because of official policies, intimidation of science teachers, the general public's misunderstanding of evolutionary theory, and a century of controversy. In addition, teachers are being pressured to introduce creationism, "creation science," and other nonscientific views, which are intended to weaken or eliminate the teaching of evolution.

Source: NSTA Position Statement The Teaching of Evolution


AAAS Board Resolution Urges Opposition to "Intelligent Design" Theory in U.S. Science Classes American Association for the Advancement of Science


The contemporary theory of biological evolution is one of the most robust products of scientific inquiry. It is the foundation for research in many areas of biology as well as an essential element of science education. To become informed and responsible citizens in our contemporary technological world, students need to study the theories and empirical evidence central to current scientific understanding.

Over the past several years proponents of so-called "intelligent design theory," also known as ID, have challenged the accepted scientific theory of biological evolution. As part of this effort they have sought to introduce the teaching of "intelligent design theory" into the science curricula of the public schools. The movement presents "intelligent design theory" to the public as a theoretical innovation, supported by
scientific evidence, that offers a more adequate explanation for the origin of the diversity of living organisms than the current scientifically accepted theory of evolution. In response to this effort, individual scientists and philosophers of science have provided substantive critiques of "intelligent design," demonstrating significant conceptual flaws in its formulation, a lack of credible scientific evidence, and misrepresentations of scientific facts.

Recognizing that the "intelligent design theory" represents a challenge to the quality of science education, the Board of Directors of the AAAS unanimously adopts the following resolution:

Resolution


WHEREAS, ID proponents claim that contemporary evolutionary theory is incapable of explaining the origin of the diversity of living organisms


WHEREAS, to date, the ID movement has failed to offer credible scientific evidence to support their claim that ID undermines the current scientifically accepted theory of evolution


WHEREAS, the ID movement has not proposed a scientific means of testing its claims


Therefore Be It Resolved, that the lack of scientific warrant for so-called "intelligent design theory" makes it improper to include as a part of science education


Therefore Be Further It Resolved, that AAAS urges citizens across the nation to oppose the establishment of policies that would permit the teaching of "intelligent
design theory" as a part of the science curricula of the public schools


Therefore Be It Further Resolved, that AAAS calls upon its members to assist those engaged in overseeing science education policy to understand the nature of science, the content of contemporary evolutionary theory and the inappropriateness of "intelligent design theory" as subject matter for science education


Therefore Be Further It Resolved, that AAAS encourages its affiliated societies to endorse this resolution and to communicate their support to appropriate parties at the federal, state and local levels of the government.


Approved by the AAAS Board of Directors on 10/18/02

Source: AAAS Board Resolution Urges Opposition to "Intelligent Design" Theory in U.S. Science Classes

Botanical Society of America


Evolution represents one of the broadest, most inclusive theories used in pursuit of and in teaching this knowledge, but it is by no means the only theory involved. Scientific theories are used in two ways: to explain what we know, and to pursue new knowledge. Evolution explains observations of shared characteristics (the result of common ancestry and descent with modification) and adaptations (the result of natural selection acting to maximize reproductive success), as well as explaining pollen:ovule ratios, weeds, deceptive pollination strategies, differences in sexual expression, dioecy, and a myriad of other biological phenomena. Far from being merely a speculative notion, as implied when someone says, “evolution is just a theory,” the core concepts of evolution are well documented and well confirmed. Natural selection has been repeatedly demonstrated in both field and laboratory, and descent with modification is so well documented that scientists are justified in saying that evolution is true.


Some people contend that creationism and its surrogate, “intelligent design,” offers an alternative explanation: that organisms are well adapted and have common characteristics because they were created just so, and they exhibit the hallmarks of intelligent design. As such, creationism is an all inclusive explanation for every biological phenomenon. So why do we support and teach evolution and not creationism/“intelligent design” if both explain the same phenomena? Are botanists just dogmatic, atheistic materialists, as some critics of science imply? Hardly, although scientists are routinely portrayed by creationists as dogmatic. We are asked, “Why, in all fairness, don’t we teach both explanations and let students decide?”


The fairness argument implies that creationism is a scientifically valid alternative to evolution, and that is not true. Science is not about fairness, and all explanations are not equal. Some scientific explanations are highly speculative with little in the way of supporting evidence, and they will stand or fall based upon rigorous testing. The history of science is littered with discarded explanations, e.g., inheritance of acquired characters, but these weren’t discarded because of public opinion or general popularity; each one earned that distinction by being scientifically falsified. Scientists may jump on a “band wagon” for some new explanation, particularly if it has tremendous explanatory power, something that makes sense out of previously unexplained phenomena. But for an explanation to become a mainstream component of a theory, it must be tested and found useful in doing science.

Read more here

Source: Botanical Society of America's Statement on Evolution


The American Society for Cell Biology


Main Website

American Geological Institute


American Geological Institute Political Challenges to the Teaching of Evolution (12-8-04)

List of Organizations at EvoWiki



Oklahoma


Oklahomans for Excellence in Science Education

OKLAHOMA’S PROPOSED TEXTBOOK DISCLAIMER ON EVOLUTION



OKLAHOMA’S PROPOSED TEXTBOOK DISCLAIMER ON EVOLUTION:

This textbook discusses evolution, a controversial theory, which some scientists present as scientific explanation for the origin of living things, such as plants and humans.
No one was present when life first appeared on earth. Therefore, any statement about life's origins should be considered as theory, not fact. The word evolution may refer to many types of change. Evolution describes changes that occur within a species. (White moths, for example, may evolve into gray moths). This process is micro evolution, which can be observed and described as fact. Evolution may also refer to the change of one living thing into another, such as reptiles into birds. This process, called macro evolution, has never been observed and should be considered a theory.
Evolution also refers to the unproven belief that random, undirected forces produced a world of living things. There are many unanswered questions about the origin of life, which are not mentioned in your textbook, including: Why did the major groups of animals suddenly appear in the fossil record, known as the Cambrian Explosion? Why have no new major groups of living things appeared in the fossil record in a long time? Why do major groups of plants and animals have no transitional forms in the fossil record? How did you and all living things come to possess such a complete and complex set of instructions for building a living body?
Study hard and keep an open mind. Someday you may contribute to the theories of how living things appeared on earth.
Source: OKLAHOMA’S PROPOSED TEXTBOOK DISCLAIMER ON EVOLUTION:

Oklahoma: Statement of OU Science Faculty



As scientists and historians of science at the University of Oklahoma, we protest the use of disclaimers or censorship of textbooks that explain biological evolution. The disclaimer approved by the state textbook committee not only misconstrues the theory of evolution, it misrepresents the meaning of scientific theory, which is a system of interconnected ideas that have been repeatedly supported by evidence and is the closest thing to explanatory truth in any science. By their action, the textbook committee demonstrates that it is either unaware of or has chosen to ignore the extraordinary wealth of factual evidence, from biology, biochemistry, and the physical and earth sciences, that supports the theory of evolution. Their decision also fails to recognize the overwhelming acceptance of evolution by the international scientific community as the only and sufficient natural explanation for diversification of life on earth.

Biological evolution, or descent with modification, is repeatedly observed in natural populations and is inferred from 3.5 billion years of fossil record and from DNA sequences of living organisms; it is characteristic of all forms of life. The theory of evolution, which explains the processes by which biological change occurs, is the central unifying concept in biology, with explanatory power on an even footing with quantum mechanics and general relativity in physics.

The same evolutionary processes that produce adaptations and species in nature (i.e. nonrandom natural selection acting on random mutations) are being borrowed by industry to produce computer-evolved designs for products as diverse as computer software, antibiotics, electronic circuits, and airplanes. By redirecting microbial evolution, Darwinian medicine is revolutionizing the way physicians combat public-health problems. Actions intent on stifling the teaching of evolution not only deprive Oklahoma's children of basic science, they are likely to have a negative impact on
producing the educated workforce needed to attract high tech industry to the state.


  1. Dr. Ola M. Fincke, Associate Professor, Zoology
  2. Dr. Caryn Vaughn, Associate Professor, Zoology; Director, OK Biological
    Survey
  3. Dr. William Shelton, Associate Professor, Zoology
  4. Dr. Michael Kaspari, Assistant Professor, Zoology
  5. Dr. Gary Wellborn, Assistant Professor, Zoology
  6. Dr. Thomas S. Ray, Professor, Zoology
  7. Dr. J. Bastian, GL Cross Professor, Zoology
  8. Dr. Ari Berkowitz, Assistant Professor, Zoology
  9. Dr. P.M. Hopkins, Professor, Zoology
  10. Dr. David S. Durica, Associate Professor, Zoology
  11. Dr. Barbara Safiejko-Mroczka, Instructor, Zoology
  12. Dr. Frank J. Sonleitner, Associate Professor, Zoology
  13. Dr. Victor H. Hutchison, GL Cross Professor, Zoology
  14. Dr. Don Wilson, Associate Professor, Zoology
  15. Dr. P.L. Schwagmeyer, Professor, Zoology
  16. Dr. Edith C. Marsh-Matthews, Assistant Professor, Zoology & OMNH
  17. Dr. Richard E. Broughton, Ph.D., Oklahoma Biological Survey
  18. Dr. Rosemary Knapp, Assistant Professor, Zoology
  19. Dr. James N. Thompson, SR Noble Professor & Chair, Zoology
  20. Dr. Douglas Mock, EGH Presidential Professor, Zoology
  21. Dr. Marielle Hoefnagels, Assistant Professor, Zoology and Botany &
    Microbiology
  22. Dr. Regina Sullivan, Associate Professor, Zoology
  23. Dr. Doug D. Gaffin, Associate Professor, Zoology
  24. Dr. Paul Bell, Professor, Zoology; Dean, Arts and Sciences
  25. Dr. Laurie Vitt, Professor, Zoology; Curator, SNOMNH
  26. Dr. Lawrence J. Weider, Associate Professor, Zoology; Director, OU Bio.
    Station
  27. Dr. William J. Matthews, Professor, Zoology; Curator, SNOMNH
  28. Dr. Janalee P. Caldwell, Associate Professor, Zoology; Curator, SNOMNH
  29. Dr. Gary D. Schnell, Professor, Zoology; Assoc. Director of Research, SNOMNH
  30. Dr. R. Cifelli, Professor, Zoology; Curator, SNOMNH
  31. Dr. M. Mares, Professor, Zoology; Curator and Director, SNOMNH
  32. Dr. Nick J. Czaplewski, Staff Curator, SNOMNH
  33. Dr. Janet K. Braun, Staff Curator, SNOMNH
  34. Dr. Bruce Hoagland, Assistant Professor, Geography; OK Biological Survey
  35. Dr. Eddie Carol Smith, Professor, Chemistry and Biochemistry
  36. Dr. Mark V. Lomolino, Associate Professor, Zoology; OK Biological Survey
  37. Dr. Mia Molvray, Assistant Professor, Botany and Microbiology
  38. Dr. Paul J. Kores, Assistant Professor, Botany and Microbiology; OK Bio. Survey
  39. Dr. Wayne Elisens, Associate Professor, Botany and Microbiology
  40. Dr. Ralph Tanner, Associate Professor, Botany and Microbiology
  41. Dr. John Skvarla, GL Cross Professor, Botany and Microbiology
  42. Dr. Leonard Beevers, GL Cross Professor and Chair, Botany & Microbiology
  43. Dr. John Fletcher, Professor, Botany and Microbiology
  44. Dr. John Downard, Associate Professor, Botany and Microbiology
  45. Dr. John Lancaster, Professor, Botany and Microbiology
  46. Dr. David McCarthy, Associate Professor, Botany & Microbiology
  47. Dr. YiQi Luo, Associate Professor, Botany and Microbiology
  48. Dr. Jimmy Ballard, Assistant Professor, Botany & Microbiology
  49. Dr. Joseph Suflita, GL Cross Research Professor, Botany & Microbiology
  50. Dr. Lee Krumholz, Assistant Professor, Botany & Microbiology
  51. Dr. Linda Wallace, Professor, Botany & Microbiology
  52. Dr. David Nagle, Associate Professor, Botany & Microbiology
  53. Dr. Scott Russell, Professor, Botany & Microbiology; Director of Noble
    EM Lab
  54. Dr. Michael McInerney, Professor, Botany & Microbiology
  55. Dr. Bruce A. Roe, GL Cross Professor, Chemistry & Biochemistry
  56. Dr. Michael R. Abraham, Professor, Chemistry & Biochemistry
  57. Dr. Roland E. Lehr, Professor, Chemistry & Biochemistry
  58. Dr. Michael T. Ashby, Associate Professor, Chemistry & Biochemistry
  59. Dr. Kenneth M. Nicholas, Professor, Chemistry & Biochemistry
  60. Dr. Ann West, Assistant Professor, Chemistry & Biochemistry
  61. Dr. Dick van der Helm, Chemistry & Biochemistry
  62. Dr. Radi Wehmshulte, Assistant Professor, Chemistry & Biochemistry
  63. Dr. Robert P. Housa, Assistant Professor, Chemistry & Biochemistry
  64. Dr. Ronald L. Halterman, Professor, Chemistry & Biochemistry
  65. Dr. Philip E. Klebba, Associate Professor, Chemistry & Biochemistry
  66. Dr. George B. Richter-Addo, Associate Professor, Chemistry &
    Biochemistry
  67. Dr. Paul F. Cook, Kerr Centeni Professor and Chair, Chemistry &
    Biochemistry
  68. Dr. Michael Nunley, Assistant Professor, Anthropology
  69. Dr. Patricia Gilman, Associate Professor, Anthropology
  70. Dr, Susan Vehik, Associate Professor, Anthropology
  71. Dr. Richard Pailes, Associate Professor, Anthropology
  72. Dr. Morris Foster, Associate Professor, Anthropology
  73. Dr. Circe Sturm, Assistant Professor, Anthropology
  74. Dr. Robert Brooks, Adjunct Associate Professor, Anthropology
  75. Dr. Paul Minnis, Associate Professor, Anthropology
  76. Dr. Lisa Lefler, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Anthropology
  77. Dr. Margaret Bender, Assistant Professor, Anthropology
  78. Dr. Marcia Haag, Visiting Assistant Professor, Anthropology
  79. Dr. Lesley Rankin-Hill, Associate Professor, Anthropology
  80. Dr. Karl Rambo, Visiting Assistant Professor, Anthropology
  81. Dr. John Monaghan, Visiting Associate Professor, Anthropology
  82. Dr. Don Wyckoff, Associate Professor, Anthropology
  83. Dr. Stewart Ryan, Associate Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  84. Dr. Ryan E. Doezema, Professor and Chair, Physics & Astronomy
  85. Dr. Sheena Murphy, Assistant Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  86. Dr. John Cowan, Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  87. Dr. Matthew B. Johnson, Assistant Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  88. Dr. Gregory A. Parker, Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  89. Dr. Neil Shafer-Ray, Assistant Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  90. Dr. William Romanishin, Associate Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  91. Dr. Eric Abraham, Assistant Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  92. Dr. Edward Baron, Associate Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  93. Dr. Bruce Mason, Associate Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  94. Dr. Kimball A. Milton, Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  95. Dr. Philip Gutierrez, Associate Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  96. Dr. Kieran Mullen, Assistant Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  97. Dr. George R. Kalbfleisch, Professor Emeritus, Physics & Astronomy
  98. Dr. John E. Furneaux, Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  99. Dr. Michael B. Santos, Associate Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  100. Dr. Robert Petry, Professor Emeritus, Physics & Astronomy
  101. Dr. Patrick Skubic, Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  102. Dr. Richard C. Henry, Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  103. Dr. Mark Keil, Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  104. Dr. David Branch, Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  105. Dr. Ronald Kantowski, Professor, Physics & Astronomy
  106. Dr. Thomas A. Dewers, Associate Professor, Geology & Geophysics
  107. Dr. R. Douglas Elmore, Klabzuba Professor, Geology & Geophysics
  108. Dr. M. Charles Gilbert, Professor, Geology & Geophysics
  109. Dr. David London, Professor & Interim Director, Geology & Geophysics
  110. Dr. Richard A. Lupia, Assistant Professor, Geology & Geophysics
  111. Dr. Kevin J. Smart, Assistant Professor, Geology & Geophysics
  112. Dr. Michael Soreghan, Lecturer, Geology & Geophysics
  113. Dr. Barry L. Weaver, Associate Professor, Geology & Geophysics
  114. Dr. Stephen R. Westrop, Professor, Geology & Geophysics
  115. Dr. Gerilyn S. Soreghan, Assistant Professor, Geology & Geophysics
  116. Dr. Charles W. Harper, Jr. Professor, Geology & Geophysics
  117. Dr. Judson L. Ahern Associate Professor, Geology & Geophysics
  118. Dr. Peter Barker, Professor, History of Science
  119. Dr. Katherine Pandora, Assistant Professor, History of Science
  120. Dr. Michael S. Reidy, Visiting Assistant Professor, History of Science
  121. Dr. Marilyn Ogilvie, Curator, History of Science Collections; Adjunct
    Profesor
  122. Dr. Judith C. Whitecotton, Visiting Instructor, History of Science
    Collections
  123. Dr. Kenneth L. Taylor, Professor, History of Science
  124. Dr. Philippe Foret , Assistant Professor of Geography; Affiliate History of
    Science
  125. Dr. Teresa K. DeBacker, Assistant Professor, Educational
    Psychology



Georgia


Georgia Citizens for Integrity in Science Education

Georgia: Jimmy Carter on Evolution 2004


Statement: Jimmy Carter on Evolution

Read the full statement from former U.S. President and Georgia native Jimmy Carter regarding a proposal in January 2004 to remove the word evolution from
textbooks in Georgia's public schools, as submitted from The Carter Center:

"As a Christian, a trained engineer and scientist, and a professor at Emory University, I am embarrassed by Superintendent Kathy Cox's attempt to censor and distort the education of Georgia's students. Her recommendation that the word "evolution" be prohibited in textbooks will adversely effect the teaching of science and leave our high school graduates with a serious handicap as they enter college or private life where freedom of speech will be permitted."

"Nationwide ridicule of Georgia's public school system will be inevitable if this proposal is adopted, and additional and undeserved discredit will be brought on our excellent universities as our state's reputation is damaged."

"All high school science teachers, being college graduates, have studied evolution as a universal element of university curricula, and would be under pressure to suppress their own educated beliefs in the classroom."

"The existing and long-standing use of the word "evolution" in our state's textbooks has not adversely affected Georgians' belief in the omnipotence of God as creator of the universe. There can be no incompatibility between Christian faith and proven facts concerning geology, biology, and astronomy. There is no need to teach that stars can fall out of the sky and land on a flat earth in order to defend our religious faith."

"Fortunately, it is the responsibility of the State Board of Education to make the final decision on the superintendent's ill-advised proposal."

Source: The Carter Center

- Oklahomans for Excellence in Science Education
Source:: The Carter Center


Georgia: Georgia Academy of Science Endorsement of AAAS Board Resolution on Intelligent Design Theory



Resolution

WHEREAS, the Georgia Academy of Science, established in 1922 and affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), has as its purpose "the promotion of the interests of science, particularly in Georgia";

WHEREAS, opponents of evolution, including proponents of so-called "intelligent design theory," have attempted to circumscribe the teaching of evolution in public schools in Georgia;

WHEREAS, the AAAS Board of Directors has issued a resolution on "intelligent design theory," stating that the lack of scientific warrant for so-called "intelligent design theory" makes it improper to include as a part of science education; that AAAS urges citizens across the nation to oppose the establishment of policies that would permit the teaching of "intelligent design theory" as a part of the science curricula of the public schools; that AAAS calls upon its members to assist those engaged in overseeing science education policy to understand the nature of science, the content of contemporary evolutionary theory and the inappropriateness of "intelligent design theory" as subject matter for science education; and that AAAS encourages its affiliated societies to endorse this resolution and to communicate their
support to appropriate parties at the federal, state and local levels of the government;

And whereas, the Georgia Academy of Science has previously addressed issues surrounding the teaching of evolution (in 1980 and in 1982);

Therefore Be It Resolved, that the Georgia Academy of Science endorses the AAAS Board resolution on "intelligent design theory";

Therefore Be It Further Resolved, that the Georgia Academy of Science publishes this resolution in the Georgia Journal of Science, that it shares this resolution with members of the Georgia Junior Academy of Science, and that it communicates this resolution to appropriate parties at the state and local levels.

Passed by the plenary session of the Georgia Academy of Science on 22 March 2003.
Source: Georgia Academy of Science Endorsement





Georgia: RESOLUTION approved April 13, 2004, by the College of Arts and Science, Georgia State University



WHEREAS we, as faculty in the College of Arts & Sciences at Georgia State University, depend upon K-12 education to instill in students the skills and knowledge needed to carry out more advanced studies and contribute to
Georgia's economy;

WHEREAS science is a systematic method of continuing investigation, based on observation, hypothesis testing, measurement, experimentation, and theory building, that leads to more adequate explanations of natural phenomena, explanations that are open to further testing, revision, and falsification, and may be accepted or rejected on the basis of evidence;

WHEREAS we favor reform in the K-12 curriculum that better trains students in the skills and knowledge of science;

WHEREAS the theory of biological evolution by natural selection is the accepted basis of the biological sciences, including medicine and agriculture, and whereas a scientific theory is a unifying concept that explains many observations and facts and explains how nature works using only testable ideas;

WHEREAS "intelligent design" and other religion- or supernatural-based explanations of natural phenomena do not meet the evidentiary standards of the scientific method or a scientific theory;

WHEREAS the Georgia Department of Education's initial draft proposal for the new K-12 state-wide Georgia Performance Standards in the natural and physical sciences omitted key scientific ideas such as evolution and its mechanisms as well as the age of the earth, plate tectonics, and the Big Bang, and encouraged the teaching of 'creationism', 'intelligent design' and related ideas in Georgia public school science courses without providing students information about the motivations behind them, and thus placing these doctrines on a false plane of intellectual equality with theories confirmed by the scientific method;

WHEREAS lesson plans or test questions should not be developed as a means of teaching ideas outside of well-accepted scientific evidence;

WHEREAS the state's science achievement tests should measure knowledge of science only;

BE IT RESOLVED that we, as faculty:

*support continuing and improving the practice of presenting the theory of evolution and other empirical science-based explanations of natural phenomena,
*oppose introducing intelligent design and other non-empirical explanations into Georgia public school science curricula, lesson plans, and testing that would in any way accommodate approaches based on either religious beliefs or other sources that
are not amenable to the scientific process of inquiry, scrutiny, testing, and revision,
*request to be involved in the future development of K-12 state-wide Georgia Performance Standards to facilitate preparing students for college-level science classes and for contributing to Georgia's economy.

RESOLUTION approved April 13, 2004, by the College of Arts and Science, Georgia State University


Clergy Statement of Support for Georgia Citizens for Integrity in Science Education

We, the undersigned, are a diverse group of clergy members who firmly support the notions that religion and science are not, in principle, antagonistic, mutually exclusive nor to be promoted one at the expense of the other.

We support Georgia Citizens for Integrity in Science Education and endorse their call for strict adherence to the principle of the Separation of Church and State as expressed in the non-establishment and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. We believe this principle protects all citizens from the use of public institutions, such as the public schools, for the promotion of one religion or religious belief over another. This protection also allows each of us to explore our chosen faiths without the constraint or coercion of governmental power.
As science strives to understand the world, we view new discoveries not as assaults on our beliefs but as insights that can enrich our appreciation of the complex beauty and awe-inspiring magnificence of the natural world. We welcome scholarly scientific investigation because it encourages us to actively reflect on the depths of our chosen faiths so that they can continue to be vibrant, relevant communities in the world. We are confident that our religions are capable of responding to new discoveries constructively and able to recognize their significance in our quest for personal meaning and study of religious context. Rather than being opposed, religion and science enrich and complement each other, together providing a more comprehensive understanding of our lives.
Those of us signed below come together not only to express our support for Georgia Citizens for Integrity in Science Education, but also as an expression of religious tolerance, respect for a wide spectrum of religious opinions and as a celebration of religious diversity.
Most respectfully submitted,
Signatories:

  1. Dr. Robert C. Ballance Heritage Baptist Church Cartersville, GA
  2. Rev. David Key Georgia Interfaith Alliance Lawrenceville, GA
  3. Rev. Marti Keller Georgia Mountains Unitarian Universalist Church Dahlonega,GA
  4. Rev. Paul M. Turner Gentle Spirit Christian Church Atlanta, GA
  5. Rev. Angeline Theisen Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Gwinnett
  6. Dr. Edward Frost Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Atlanta Atlanta, GA
  7. Rev. Greg Ward Unitarian Universalist Metro Atlanta North Congregation
  8. Rabbi Steven Lebow Temple Kol Emeth Marietta, GA
  9. Rev. Mrs. Laura H. Jernigan Presbytery of Greater Atlanta


UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA BIOLOGY ACADEMIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE STATEMENT ON EVOLUTION



Biological evolution is a major unifying concept in modern biology and provides a conceptual framework that helps make biology a unified science. The centrality of evolution to modern biology has been acknowledged by a number of major scientific organizations including the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the National Academy of Sciences. As the appointed representatives of college and university biology professors from around the state, we expect that all students entering our colleges and universities have a clear and accurate understanding of the basic tenets of biological evolution so that they will be prepared for college-level biology classes.
Furthermore, we oppose attempts to have creationism (or its variants “scientific creationism” or “intelligent design”) taught as science because these ideas are outside the scope of science. In order to properly prepare scientifically literate citizens/students, it is necessary for schools to teach biological evolution.
As professional scientists and educators, we offer our services to any faculty, administrator or school board who needs advice about how to best teach biological evolution.

Adopted 07 November 2003 by the following members of the USG Biology Academic Advisory Committee:

  1. Ray Barber, Ph.D.; - Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College
  2. Kenneth Relyea, Ph.D., - Armstrong Atlantic State University
  3. Emil Urban, Ph.D., - Augusta State University
  4. Greg Hampikian, Ph.D., - Clayton College & State University
  5. Eugene Keferl, Ph.D., - Coastal Georgia Community College
  6. William S. Birkhead, Ph.D., - Columbus State University
  7. John Lugthart, Ph.D., - Dalton State College
  8. Steve Schenk, Ph.D., - Darton College
  9. Bill Wall, Ph.D., - Georgia College & State University
  10. Sheryl Shanholtzer, Ph.D., - Georgia Perimeter College
  11. Stephen Vives, Ph.D., - Georgia Southern University
  12. Steven Kudravi, Ph.D., - Georgia State University
  13. Ronald H. Matson, Ph.D., - Kennesaw State University
  14. Eric L. Sun, Ph.D., - Macon State College
  15. John Pasto, Ph.D., - Middle Georgia College
  16. Terry Schwaner, Ph.D., - North Georgia College & State University
  17. Harpal Singh, Ph.D., & Gene Mesco, Ph.D., - Savannah State University
  18. Timothy Rhoads, Ph.D., - South Georgia College
  19. Bill Burnett, Ph.D., - Southern Polytechnic State University
  20. David L. Bechler, Ph.D., - Valdosta State University



Kansas


Kansas Citizens for Science


: Website

Kansas: Kansas Rejects Evolution:A Response from the Geoscience Community October 1999

Source: Kansas Rejects Evolution:A Response from the Geoscience Community

The Kansas State Board of Education voted Aug. 11 to eliminate all references to evolution—as well as to the Big Bang theory, the age of Earth or biological macroevolution—from the state’s science curriculum. Geotimes asked members of the geoscience community to respond to this decision. Their letters follow:

: Creation Science: Bad Science, Bad Religion!
: Active scientists make the difference
: Scientists on school boards
: Science Evolves!
: Evolution: Not in Kansas Anymore
: Scientists are the solution


Texas


Evolution debate continues in Texas

Trying to impress upon the board the importance of teaching evolution, many notable Texas scientists testified at the meeting, including Steven Weinberg, Nobel Laureate and physics professor at the University of Texas, Robert Dennison, president of the Texas Association of Biology Teachers, and Terry Maxwell, biology professor and curator of birds at Angelo State University. Evolution is one of the great unifying concepts in the natural sciences and not teaching it, or teaching what some call the weaknesses of it, would place extra hurdles in students' paths, they said.

Source: Evolution debate continues in Texas

Texas: 550+ Texas scientists and educators agree on teaching evolution

On November 1, 2003, a statement was released urging the Texas Board of Education to resist pressure on it to undermine the treatment of evolution in biology textbooks now under consideration. Signed by over 550 Texas scientists and educators, the statement observes that "Any dilution in textbooks of the overwhelming scientific evidence for evolution should sound an alarm to every parent and teacher."


The statement was sponsored by the American Institute of Physics; the American Institute of Biological Sciences and several of its member societies, the American Geological Institute, and the American Astronomical Society also encouraged their members in Texas to sign the statement.

November 5, 2003
Source: 550+ Texas scientists and educators agree on teaching evolution

November 1, 2003
Dear Board of Education member,

As scientists and teachers who live and work in Texas, we write to urge the Texas State Board of Education to choose only textbooks that present accepted, peer-reviewed science and pedagogical expertise. We believe that such a process leads to strong curricula of the highest quality, accuracy, and pedagogical appropriateness.

An institution known for promoting the inclusion of religious tenets in science curricula is trying to water down the strong, peer-reviewed science in the textbooks and to influence the Board of Education to choose these unacceptable books.

At a time when our nation’s welfare increasingly depends on technology, it has never been more important for students to understand the basic ideas of modern science. Evolution is not a belief, a hunch, or an untested hypothesis; it has been extensively tested and repeatedly verified. Any dilution in textbooks of the overwhelming scientific evidence for evolution should sound an alarm to every parent and teacher.

We urge you to continue supporting high standards in Texas science textbooks and not to be swayed by misleading information. Your diligence will ensure that Texas students will be better equipped for higher education and the workplace. Very Truly Yours,

Affiliation for identification purposes only

  1. Dr. Steven Weinberg The University of Texas at Austin Nobel Prize in Physics, 1979
  2. Dr. Neal Lane Rice University Former White House science advisor
  3. Dr. Michael Brown The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine, 1985
  4. Dr. Johann Deisenhofer Regental Professor and Investigator, HHMI The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1988
  5. C.A. Quarles Department of Physics Texas Christian University and Chair, TexasSection of the American Physical Society
  6. Arthur H. Harris Department of Biological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso
  7. John E. Smaardyk, Ph.D. Halliburton Energy Services
  8. Dr. Robert Andreas Austin Rohvic Scientific
  9. Julia Powell Plainview High School Science Department
  10. Shannon Starnes Department of Science Tarrant Community College
  11. Jasmina Marsh Astronomy Department University of Texas at Austin
  12. Bob Perchonok Principal Scientist Schlumberger
  13. Duane Buhrmester Professor of Psychology University of Texas at Dallas
  14. Andrey Bakulin, PhD Research Geophysicist Shell International Exploration and Production Inc.
  15. Dr. Steven G. Henry Manager GeoLearn, L.L.C.
  16. Mary Kay Hemenway, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin Department of Astronomy Member, Texas Hall of Fame for Science, Mathematics, and Technology
  17. Christine Morshedi, Ph. D. Geophysical Associate ExxonMobil Exploration Company
  18. Dr. Ronald J. Wilhelm Department of Physics /> Honors College Texas Tech University
  19. Norman L. Markworth Department of Physics and Astronomy Stephen F. Austin State University
  20. Esther Betran Ph.D. Biology Department University of Texas at Arlington
  21. Kimberly Willis Principal Scientist Lockheed Martin Space Operations
  22. John V. Shebalin, PhD NASA Johnson Space Center Dan Schultz-Ela Research Scientist - Applied Geodynamics Laboratory Bureau of Economic Geology The University of Texas at Austin
  23. Jean C.C. Hsieh Chevron Texaco
  24. Ted Dohmen Corporate Geophysical Advisor Burlington Resources
  25. Scott Painter, Ph.D. Southwest Research Institute
  26. Ryan Stepler Geophysicist Marathon Oil Company
  27. Robert McKee Principal Engineer, Southwest Research Institute Father of a successful PhD student
  28. Steven D. London Professor of Mathematics University of Houston-Downtown
  29. Christopher T. Baldwin Professor of Geology Sam Houston State University
  30. Mona E. S. Hochman Research Associate Seafood Safety Laboratory Texas A&M University at Galveston
  31. Monica A. Menz Assistant Professor/Director Lab. for Plant Genome Technology Institute for Plant Genomics & Biotechnology Texas A&M University
  32. Dr. John V. Walther Mathews Professor of Geochemistry Southern Methodist University
  33. Dr. Jill Marshall Science and Mathematics Education University of Texas at Austin
  34. Nicholas Sterling The University of Texas Department of Astronomy
  35. William H. Jefferys Harlan J. Smith Centennial Professor in Astronomy Department of Astronomy University of Texas at Austin
  36. Debra Weeden Sr. Petroleum Geophysicist ExxonMobil Exploration Company
  37. Dr. B. Prabhakaran Dept. of Computer Science University of Texas at Dallas
  38. Mario C. Diaz Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy and Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville
  39. Thomas R. Williams Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers Ret. Visiting Scholar in History, Physics and Astronomy departments Rice University
  40. Gordon MacAlpine Chair of Physics and Astronomy Department Trinity University
  41. Alan Morris Professor of Geology Earth and Environmental Science University of Texas at San Antonio
  42. Augusta Era Golian Licensed Geophysicist President Seismic Quality Control, Inc.
  43. Dr. Jonathan Bohmann Dept. of Chemistry Texas Lutheran University
  44. Ray H. Baughman Robert A. Welch Professor of Chemistry and Director of the NanoTech Institute University of Texas at Dallas
  45. Dale Handlin Senior Staff Research Scientist KRATON Polymers, LLC
  46. W. Dennis Dean, Ph.D. Alcon Laboratories
  47. A. J. Syllaios Raytheon
  48. Robert J. Riggins Teacher, Science Academy of South Texas 550+ Texas Scientists, Teachers Agree on Teaching Evolution
  49. Ed Darrell Irving Independent School District
  50. Dr. Jonathan Bohmann Dept. of Chemistry Texas Lutheran University
  51. Catrina M. Hamilton, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Physics and Astronomy Rice University
  52. Paul Harvey Professor Astronomy Department University of Texas
  53. Neal J. Evans II University of Texas at Austin Department of Astronomy
  54. Jerry D. Johnson, Ph.D. Professor Department of Biological Sciences The University of Texas at El Paso
  55. Ed Barker Research Scientist McDonald Observatory The University of Texas at Austin
  56. Carlos Allende Prieto Research Scientist at the University of Texas
  57. Christopher M. Johns-Krull Assistant Professor Department of Physics & Astronomy Rice University
  58. Beverley J. Wills Astronomy Department University of Texas at Austin
  59. Fritz Benedict McDonald Observatory
  60. Christopher M. Olsen Division of Neuropharmacology University of Texas at Austin
  61. Dr. Giovanni Fossati Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Rice University
  62. Paul Shapiro Professor Dept. of Astronomy The University of Texas at Austin
  63. Henry J. Leckenby, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Physics/Geosciences Department Texas A&M University – Kingsville
  64. Dr. Kurt D. Retherford Department of Space Sciences Southwest Research Institute
  65. James T. (Jim) Collins, Ph.D. Zoologist and instructor of biology at Kilgore College
  66. Edward L. Robinson William B. Blakemore Regents Professor in Astronomy
  67. Dr. Ben Liles, Jr., Chair Department of Biology Temple College
  68. Ted von Hippel, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin McDonald Observatory
  69. Walter F. Huebner Southwest Research Institute
  70. Dr. Verne V. Smith Associate Professor of Physics & Astronomy, University of Texas at El Paso Research Fellow, McDonald Observatory University of Texas at Austin
  71. William Lee Powell Jr. Department of Physics Texas Tech University
  72. Jay A. Raney Bureau of Economic Geology The University of Texas at Austin
  73. Ramón H. Treviño The Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin
  74. Dr. Robert J. Ferguson Assistant Professor Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at Austin
  75. Patricia E. Ganey-Curry Research Scientist Associate V The University of Texas at Austin Member Liberty Hill ISD Board of Trustees
  76. Dr. G. Shanmugam Adjunct Professor Department of Geology The University of Texas at Arlington
  77. Earle F. McBride Gregory Chair in Sedimentary Geology Department of Geological Sciences University of Texas at Austin
  78. C. T. Hallmark Professor Soil and Crop Sciences Department Texas A&M University
  79. Dr. Lorraine van Waasbergen Department of Biology University of Texas at Arlington
  80. Lisa M. Gahagan Institute for Geophysics The University of Texas at Austin
  81. Steffen Saustrup Institute for Geophysics The University of Texas at Austin
  82. Bethany D. Rinard Assistant Professor of Geosciences Department of Chemistry, Geosciences, and Environmental Science Tarleton State University
  83. Sean Sandifer Gulick, Ph.D., Research Associate Jackson School of Geosciences Institute for Geophysics University of Texas
  84. Julianne I. Moses Lunar and Planetary Inst.
  85. Dr. Martha R. Scott Associate Professor Dept. of Oceanography Texas A&M University
  86. Dr. Benjamin S. Giese Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University
  87. Christopher J. Bell Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at Austin
  88. John Haglund Geology teacher Tarrant County College
  89. F. Curtis (Curt) Michel Physics Rice University
  90. Dr. Peter H. Santschi Professor of Oceanography Texas A&M University
  91. Dr. Terry L. Wade Deputy Director-Environmental Science Geochemical and Environmental Research Group Texas A&M University
  92. Robert Hetland Assistant Professor Texas A&M University
  93. Robert A. Duce, Professor Depts. of Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences Texas A&M University
  94. Jean-Philippe Nicot, Ph.D., P.G., P.E. Research Associate Bureau of Economic Geology The University of Texas at Austin
  95. Dr. W. P. Roberts Department of Geology Stephen F. Austin State University
  96. Caroline L. Breton Research Associate, Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin
  97. Grady Price Blount, Ph.D., Chair Department of Physical and Life Sciences Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
  98. Worth D. Nowlin, Jr. Distinguished Professor of Oceanography Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University
  99. Dr. Bruce Herbert Geology & Geophysics Texas A&M University
  100. Mitchell Malone Staff Scientist Ocean Drilling Program Texas A&M University
  101. Dr. Larry Jay Friesen Astronomy University of Houston
  102. Dr. Dmitry Bizyaev Postdoc Research Associate University of Texas at El Paso
  103. Wilford D. Gardner Department Head and Professor Department. of Oceanography Texas A&M University
  104. Dr. Anne Raymond Cook Professor Dept. of Geology and Geophysics Texas A&M University
  105. John Mace Grunsfeld, PhD Houston, TX Astronomy and Aerospace Industry
  106. Dr. Aaron S. Yoshinobu Assistant Professor Department of Geosciences Texas Tech University
  107. Peter Trabant, Ph.D. Consultant Oceanographer Gail Christeson University of Texas at Austin
  108. James C. Gibeaut, Ph.D. University of Texas at Austin Andrew Hajash, Professor Department of Geology and Geophysics Texas A&M University
  109. Bob Krantz, PhD Upstream Technology - Integrated Geological Analysis ConocoPhillips Inc.
  110. Dr. Stephen Karner Texas A&M University
  111. Dr. Eric William James Research Scientist Associate, Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at Austin
  112. J. Maximilian Koehne, PhD Assistant Research Scientist Dept. of Biological & Agricultural Engineering Texas A&M University
  113. Don Collins Department of Atmospheric Sciences Texas A&M University - College Station
  114. Charles Jackson Institute for Geophysics The John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin
  115. James A. (Jim) Thomson BP EPT Geodrilling Services Team British Petroleum
  116. Stephen C. Ruppel, PhD Research Scientist, Bureau of Economic Geology The John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin
  117. Dr. Bobby J. Presley Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University
  118. Dr. Mark T. Adams McDonald Observatory University of Texas at Austin
  119. Patrick Hartigan Professor, Physics and Astronomy Rice University
  120. William W. Sager Professor and Jane and R. Ken Williams ’45 Chair in Ocean Drilling Science, Education, and Technology Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University
  121. Barbara J. Mahler, Ph.D., P.G. Research Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey
  122. Tracy Villareal Associate Professor Marine Science Institute The University of Texas at Austin
  123. Bassett Maguire Emeritus Professor Integrative Biology& Marine Science The University of Texas at Austin
  124. Katerina Petronotis Ocean Drilling Program
  125. David Rajmon Shell EPT - Exploratory Research
  126. E. William Behrens Ret. Faculty in Dept. of Marine Science The University of Texas at Austin
  127. Dr. Andrew D. Cunningham BP
  128. Frank Toffoletto Rice University
  129. Brian A. Tinsley, Professor of Physics, University of Texas at Dallas
  130. Dr. Kirk McIntosh Jackson School of Geosciences University of Texas at Austin
  131. Russell Hamman ExxonMobil Development Company
  132. Timothy S. Dulaney Geoscientist ExxonMobil Exploration Company
  133. Dr. Robin Brinkmeyer Molecular Microbial Biologist Texas A&M University at Galveston
  134. Adrian Lenardic Assistant Professor of Geophysics Department of Earth Science Rice University
  135. Rainer Amon, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Marine Sciences and Oceanography Texas A&M University at Galveston
  136. Julia S. Wellner Department of Earth Science Rice University
  137. Patrick Wheatley Jackson School of Geosciences Department of Geological Sciences University of Texas at Austin
  138. Ann Molineux, Ph.D. Collections Manager Non-vertebrate Paleontology Texas Memorial Museum
  139. Robert J. Stern Professor & Head of Department Geosciences Department University of Texas at Dallas
  140. Dr. Jessica Maisano High-Resolution X-ray CT Facility Department of Geological Sciences University of Texas at Austin
  141. Dr. Alyson Ponomarenko Department of Earth and Environmental Science University of Texas at San Antonio
  142. Dr. Eric R. Swanson Professor of Geology University of Texas at Austin
  143. Thomas E. Jones Research Assistant Stable Isotope Laboratory Department of Geology & Geophysics Texas A&M University
  144. Wilford D. Gardner Department Head and Professor Department. of Oceanography Texas A&M University
  145. Richard J. Weiland, Ph.D. Shallow Hazards Geologist BP America, Inc. Geo-Drilling Services
  146. Kim M Bates U-Houston/ExxonMobil
  147. John W. Nielsen-Gammon Professor and Texas State Climatologist Department of Atmospheric Sciences Texas A&M University
  148. Andreas Kronenberg Professor Texas A&M University Department of Geology and Geophysics
  149. Craig Pollock Southwest Research Institute Randy Gladstone Institute Scientist Southwest Research Institute
  150. Matthew J. Grove, Ph.D. Exploration Geologist Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
  151. Hans G. Ave Lallemant Professor of Earth Science Rice University
  152. Noel T. Clemens Associate Professor, Robert and Francis Stark Centennial Fellowship in Engineering Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics University of Texas at Austin
  153. Robert Deegan Research Associate Center for Nonlinear Dynamics University of Texas at Austin
  154. Jennifer Steele Applied Physics Rice University
  155. Hugo Sanabria University of Houston
  156. Thomas Moore Southwest Research Institute
  157. Michael R. Matthews Ph.D 3M Company
  158. Wolfgang Donner Department of Physics University of Houston
  159. Hong-Wen Ren Applied Optoelectronics Incorporation Damien Gray, PhD Senior Software Engineer National Instruments
  160. Thomas C. Killian, PhD Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Rice University
  161. Nelson E. Claytor, Ph.D. President Fresnel Technologies, Inc.
  162. Dr. Michael Ibison Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin Valery Pokrovsky Department of Physics Texas A&M University
  163. Dr. Randall C. Furlong, Esq. Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
  164. Richard Matzner Professor of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  165. Matthew LeBourgeois Texas Center for Superconductivity and Advanced Materials University of Houston
  166. Prof. R. Bruce Weisman Department of Chemistry Rice University
  167. John C. Hardy Professor of Physics Texas A&M University
  168. Thomas Barber Schlumberger
  169. Eshel Faraggi Physics Department University of Texas at Austin
  170. Roy Schwitters Chair, UT Austin Dept. of Physics
  171. Jaan Laane Professor of Chemistry Texas A&M University
  172. Laura Gough, Assistant Professor Department of Biology University of Texas at Arlington
  173. Dr. Rafael López-Mobilia Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Texas at San Antonio
  174. Sally Hicks Associate Professor Department of Physics University of Dallas
  175. Tracy N. Tipping Deputy Radiation Safety Officer Environmental Health & Safety University of Texas at Austin
  176. G. King Walters Rice University
  177. Francis Redfern Professor of Physics Texarkana College
  178. Ahmet Y. Aydemir Institute for Fusion Studies University of Texas at Austin
  179. Alex Kalamarides, Ph.D. Executive VP and Managing Director, AMI-Partners
  180. Dr. Anthony E. Stephens MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.
  181. Simon C. Moss M.D. Anderson Chair of Physics University of Houston
  182. Paul G. Rudolf, Ph.D. Forward Vision, Inc.
  183. Len Trombetta Dept. Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Houston
  184. James E. Boggs University of Texas at Austin
  185. Carlos Gonzalez Lepera, Ph.D. Vice President - CYCLOTOPE Adjunct Professor - MD Anderson Cancer Center
  186. Fabrizio Gabbiani Assistant Professor Division of Neuroscience Baylor College of Medicine
  187. Carl A. Gagliardi Physics Dept. Texas A&M University
  188. Fred Olness Professor & Chair Department of Physics Southern Methodist University
  189. Gustavo E. Scuseria Robert A. Welch Professor Department of Chemistry Rice University
  190. Professor Kenneth S. Ball, Ph.D., P.E. Temple Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Texas at Austin
  191. Werner Horsthemke Department of Chemistry Southern Methodist University
  192. Jairo Sinova Assistant Professor Texas A&M University
  193. Alvaro S. Nunez Physics Department University of Texas at Austin

  194. Charles Bloch, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Dept. of Radiation Physics Univ. of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  195. Dr. Bruce R. Johnson Rice University
  196. Charles W. Myles, Ph.D. Professor of Physics Co-Director, Engineering Physics B.S. Program Department of Physics Texas Tech University
  197. Dr. Robert L. Ray Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  198. Robert Glosser University of Texas at Dallas
  199. Dr. Ronald Bravenec Research Associate Fusion Research Center University of Texas at Austin
  200. Alan Sill Research Professor of Physics Texas Tech University
  201. William J. B. Oldham Professor Emeritus Texas Tech University
  202. Klaus W. Zieher Associate Professor Texas Tech University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
  203. Carl W. Hardin, M.D. South Texas Radiology Group
  204. Kendra L. Wallis Physics Department University of Texas at Arlington
  205. Prof. John T. Markert Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  206. Raymond Goldstein Southwest Research Institute
  207. Roland E. Allen Physics Department Texas A&M University
  208. Edward S Fry Physics Department Texas A&M University
  209. Joseph H. Ross Jr. Dept. of Physics Texas A&M University
  210. Robert N. Cherry, Jr., Ph.D. Certified Health Physicist
  211. Dr. Marc in het Panhuis Assistant Professor of Physics Department of Physics and NanoTech Institute University of Texas at Dallas
  212. Richard Fink Vice President Applied Nanotech, Inc.
  213. William McCormick Professor of Physics Emeritus University of Texas at Austin
  214. David Toback Assistant Professor of Physics Texas A&M University
  215. Sharath S. Girimaji Aerospace Engineering Department Texas A & M University
  216. William H. Marlow, Professor Nuclear Engineering Department Texas A&M University
  217. Randall G. Hulet Fayez Sarofim Professor of Physics Rice University
  218. Daniel Mittleman ECE Department Rice University
  219. Dr. John A. Holy BWXT Pantex
  220. M. Suhail Zubairy Professor Department of Physics Texas A&M University
  221. B. Paul Padley Assistant Prof. of Physics and Astronomy Rice University
  222. A. Wilson Nolle Prof. Of Physics Emeritus The University of Texas at Austin
  223. F. L. Waelbroeck Institute for Fusion Studies University of Texas
  224. Stefan K. Estreicher, Ph.D. Paul Whitfield Horn Professor Physics Department Texas Tech University
  225. Dr. G.E.Hite Professor in the Department of Marine Science Texas A&M University-Galveston
  226. James L. Kinsey D. R. Bullard-Welch Foundation Professor of Science Rice University
  227. Lawrence L. Griffin, Associate Professor Department of Marine Sciences Texas A&M University at Galveston
  228. Mathew Fitzpatrick Postdoctoral Researcher The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  229. Michael Gorman Department of Physics University of Houston
  230. David Bixler Assistant Professor of Physics Angelo State University
  231. Kuang-An Chang, Assistant Professor Coastal & Ocean Engineering Division Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University
  232. Bea Aton Ph.D. Physiology Software Engineer, Texas Instruments
  233. Harvey M. Fishman, Ph.D. Professor, Physiology & Biophysics University of Texas Medical Branch
  234. Tom Aton, PhD TI Fellow, Texas Instruments
  235. Dr. Stanley J. Kleis University of Houston Department of Mechanical Engineering
  236. Dr. Ramon E. Lopez C. Sharp Cook Distinguished Professor Department of Physics University of Texas at El Paso
  237. Prof. Wayne Saslow Department of Physics Texas A&M University
  238. Leonard Kleinman Professor of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  239. Stephen A. Fulling Professor of Mathematics and Physics Texas A&M University
  240. W. L. Anderson, Professor Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Houston
  241. Donald G. Naugle Physics Department Texas A&M University
  242. Anatoly B. Kolomeisky Assistant Professor Department of Chemistry Rice University
  243. Billy E. Bonner Professor of Physics Rice University
  244. Lynn L. Hatfield Physics Department Texas Tech University
  245. David W. Ross Fusion Research Center The University of Texas
  246. Kenneth Duerksen Tokyo Electron America
  247. Julia C. Wickett Department of Physics University of Houston
  248. Richard Knight Physics and Astronomy Department University of Texas at San Antonio
  249. Jorge A. Munoz, Jr. The University of Texas at El Paso
  250. E. G. (Jerry) Bylander, PhD, President, Bylander Associates, Inc. Elder, Grand Avenue Presbyterian Church
  251. Professor Gene O. Carlisle Department of Physics West Texas A&M University
  252. Duane G. Laurent, Ph.D. Senior Design Manager STMicroelectronics, Inc.
  253. Jay S. Chivian, Lockheed Martin Missiles & Fire Control (retired)
  254. Bill Maier PDX, Inc.
  255. Jose N. Pecina, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Brownsville
  256. Qiming Zhang Associate Professor of Physics University of Texas at Arlington
  257. Vikram Kodibagkar, Ph.D. Department of Radiology UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
  258. Arthur H. Thompson Division of Condensed Matter Physics Fellow, American Physical Society
  259. James Stephens, PhD Microseismic, Inc.
  260. Dr. Gerhard G. Paulus Associate Professor Department of Physics Texas A&M University
  261. Zoltan A. Schelly, Professor Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Texas at Arlington
  262. Mario C. Diaz Professor of Physics Distinguished Fulbright Chair in Gravitational Wave Detection 2003-4 University of Texas at Brownsville
  263. David F. Brower University of Texas at Austin – Retired
  264. Anthony Chan Associate Professor of Physics and Astronomy Rice University
  265. Paul Bernazzani, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Chemistry and Physics Lamar University
  266. Richard Stroynowski Professor of Physics Southern Methodist University
  267. Gregory Mulhollan, Ph.D. Saxet Surface Science
  268. Douglas J. Klein Dept. of Marine Sciences Texas A&M University at Galveston
  269. Chia-Ren Hu Professor Department of Physics Texas A&M University
  270. Dr. R. S. Rubins Professor of Physics University of Texas at Arlington
  271. Robert Helleman Professor of Physics, retired University of Houston
  272. John W. Keto Thornberry Prof. of Physics
  273. Matteo Pasquali Assistant Professor Department of Chemical Engineering Rice University
  274. Doug Verret, Ph.D. Texas Instruments Fellow
  275. Austin M. Gleeson Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  276. Uwe Oberlack Assistant Professor Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Rice University
  277. Mike Knewtson Schlumberger
  278. Andrew Cole Institute for Fusion Studies Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  279. David Denley, Ph.D. Shell Chemicals
  280. Mykhailo Fomytskyi Institute for Fusion Studies Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  281. Elizabeth Covington Texas State University
  282. Kevin M Lee Fusion Research Center Physics Deptartment University of Texas at Austin
  283. David Gavenda Physics Department University of Texas at Austin
  284. Robert A. Graham, retired American Physical Society Fellow, AAAS Fellow, Senior Member Emeritus, IEEE The Tome Group
  285. David Walker Mountain View High School Biology Teacher
  286. William G. Durrer Physics Department University of Texas at El Paso
  287. Dr. Daniel Suson Chair, Department of Physics/Geosciences Texas A&M University-Kingsville
  288. Andreas Mershin, PhD Texas A&M University Dept. of Physics
  289. Warren Lieu BECK
  290. David L. Griscom impactGlass research international
  291. Wiley L. Parker General Electric
  292. William Madigan, Ph.D. Baker Hughes Oilfield Services
  293. Elmer Eisner Adjunct Professor Computer and Applied Math Rice University
  294. Dr. David Shiner Associate Professor of Physics University of North Texas
  295. Donald E. Woessner Adjunct Professor of Radiology Rogers Magnetic Resonance Center
  296. Peter McIntyre Professor of Physics Texas A&M University
  297. Prof. Arno Bohm Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  298. Dr. Bonnie Valant-Spaight Research Physicist PathFinder Energy Services
  299. Joseph Christensen Department of Physics McMurry University
  300. Clark W. Beasley Department of Biology McMurry University
  301. Sivaram Arepalli, Ph.D GBTech/> NASA-Johnson Space Center
  302. Dr. David Donnelly Department of Physics Texas State University
  303. Stephen D. Baker, Professor of Physics Department of Physics and Astronomy Rice University
  304. Yuri Gartstein Associate Professor Department of Physics University of Texas at Dallas
  305. H. Adam Stevens, M.A. Manager, Maya Muon Tomography Project Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  306. John Reading, Texas Distinguished Scientist, Texas A&M, Physics
  307. Carlos R. Ordonez Physics Department University of Houston
  308. Dr. John L. Margrave Butcher Professor of Chemistry Rice University
  309. David Loyd Dean of Sciences Angelo State University
  310. W. D. Deering Department of Physics University of North Texas
  311. H. Nate Bachman, PhD Senior Physicist Schlumberger
  312. Douglas Reinelt Southern Methodist University
  313. Stephan Bless, ScD University of Texas at Austin
  314. Prof. Emeritus Lorin L. Vant-Hull University of Houston, Physics Department
  315. Dr. James Waggoner Schlumberger Well Services (ret)
  316. Barry Friedman Department of physics Sam Houston State University
  317. Donald G. Brunder, Ph.D. IS Team Leader Academic Resources University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
  318. Henrietta L. Kohn Medical Technologist, ASCP
  319. Jorge A. Lopez University of Texas at El Paso
  320. Richard C. Herrick, Ph.D. University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
  321. Frank W. Guy, PhD. and Roberta Buchanan Guy, RN President, Texas State Board of Directors Health Occupations Students of America
  322. Lawrence C. Shepley Associate Professor, Retired Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  323. Ted G. Byrom, PhD Texas A&M University, Retired
  324. Terry C. Maxwell, PhD. Department of Biology Angelo State University
  325. Alex Rimberg Department of Physics and Astronomy Rice University
  326. Ted W. Reid, Ph.D. Professor Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Science Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
  327. C. Magnus L. Rittby, Ph. D. Chair Department of Physics and Astronomy Texas Christian University
  328. Dr. William R.M. Graham Professor, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Director, Graduate Program Texas Christian University
  329. Dr Deborah Leddon University of Texas
  330. Thomas E. Coan Southern Methodist University
  331. Qiming Li Sugar Land Product Center Schlumberger
  332. Rebecca Reichenbach, science teacher Mountain View High School
  333. Robert D. Rathmell Chief Scientist Axcelis Technologies
  334. Brian Clark, Ph.D. Schlumberger Fellow Schlumberger
  335. Prof. Thomas W. Hill Physics & Astronomy Dept. Rice University
  336. Curt Wyman Program Manager Motorola, Inc.
  337. Joseph M. Izen Professor of Physics University of Texas at Dallas
  338. Dr. Dennis Hamill Board Chairman Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation
  339. Todd Flippo Senior Scientist Alcon Labs, Inc.
  340. Stan Treanor Calculus & Physics Teacher Merkel High School
  341. Michael Downer Jack S. Josey Professor Physics Department University of Texas at Austin
  342. Richard J. Cassin, Retired geologist Member Geological Society of America, West Texas Geological Society
  343. Katherine Brown Downey, PhD Senior Lecturer School of Arts and Humanities University of Texas at Dallas
  344. Michael A. Shelley, P.E. Dr. Ed Stone Senior Lecturer, Mathematics University of Texas at Dallas
  345. Eyal Gilboa Center for Particle Physics The Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  346. Susan P. Chizeck, Ph.D. MS GR 26, Interdisciplinary Studies University of Texas at Dallas
  347. Dr. Geoffrey S. D. Beach Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  348. Troy T. Byrne Science Chair Americas High School
  349. Rick Holt, B.S.Ed., M.Div Secondary Science Teacher, Americas High School
  350. Aubra Anthony High Energy Group Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  351. Carl Knutson Physics Department University of Texas at Austin
  352. Will Grigsby The University of Texas
  353. Leah Shackman Physics Department University of Texas at Austin
  354. Prof. Jonathan L. Sessler Roland K. Pettit Centennial Professor of Chemistry Editor, Supramolecular Chemistry Associate Editor, J. Porphyrins & Phthalocyanines University of Texas at Austin
  355. Nicholas Matlis Femtosecond Spectroscopy Group University of Texas at Austin
  356. Jerome Bellian Research Scientist Associate Bureau of Economic Geology University of Texas at Austin
  357. Michael Wolf Professor of Mathematics Rice University
  358. Ronald S. Hanson Engineering Manager at Motorola, Inc.
  359. Richard Wheelus Motorola eMC SRAM Program Management
  360. Robert Hardt William Moody Professor of Mathematics Rice University
  361. Britt C. Cain Adjunct Instructor of Mathematics Austin Community College
  362. Gary W. Sykes, Ph.D. Director, Institute for Law Enforcement Administration Vice President, The Center for American and Intern’l Law
  363. Robert G. Tull, PhD Sr. Research Scientist Emeritus McDonald Observatory University of Texas
  364. Jeffrey D. Olson Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  365. Joseph R. Davis, PhD Davis Exploration Consulting
  366. Edward B. Flagg Physics Department University of Texas at Austin
  367. Walter L. Borst Professor of Physics Department of Physics Texas Tech University
  368. Dr. John R. Hedstrom Retired from Raytheon University of Texas at Dallas
  369. Dr. Vladimir Horvat Research Scientist Texas A&M University
  370. Dr. Edwin H-M. Sha, Professor Department of Computer Science University of Texas at Dallas
  371. Prof. Rory Coker Physics Department University of Texas at Austin
  372. Harry L. Swinney Sid Richardson Foundation Regents Chair Physics Department and Center for Nonlinear Dynamics University of Texas at Austin
  373. Purna Murthy, B.Sc, M.Sc., MBA Engineering Manager, Hewlett-Packard Company
  374. Dr. Sonia Paban Physics, Theory Group University of Texas at Austin
  375. Sanjay Banerjee Cockrell Family Regents Chair in Electrical & Computer Eng. Director, Microelectronics Research Center University of Texas at Austin
  376. Lenore Dai Department of Chemical Engineering Texas Tech University
  377. Enrico Rossi Physics Department University of Texas at Austin
  378. Meng Tao, Ph.D. NanoFAB Center University of Texas at Arlington
  379. Paul Bracken University of Texas, Edinburg
  380. Victor G. Hadjiev, PhD Research Scientist Texas Center for Superconductivity and Advanced Materials University of Houston
  381. Richard D. Hazeltine Professor of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  382. Karol Lang Professor of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  383. Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University
  384. Allan MacDonald Physics Department University of Texas at Austin
  385. Dr. Ramon Ravelo Physics Department and Materials Research Institute University of Texas at El Paso
  386. Dr. Mark R. Skokan Member, Group Technical Staff DRS Infrared Technologies, LP
  387. Nasir Basit, Ph.D. Research Engineering Scientist, NanoFAB R&T Facility University of Texas at Arlington
  388. Kevin F. Kelly Assistant Professor Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Rice University
  389. David H. Hough Assistant Professor of Physics Trinity University
  390. Paul H. Cox Professor of Physics Texas A&M University-Kingsville
  391. Dr. Yang LI Physics Department Texas A&M University
  392. Dr. Thomas O. Bush Dallas Baptist University
  393. Simon C. Moss M.D. Anderson Chair of Physics University of Houston
  394. Dr. Jose Perez Assistant Professor Department of Physics University of North Texas
  395. Peter J. Rossky, Marvin K. Collie-Welch Regents Chair in Chemistry and Professor of Chemical Engineering Dept. of Chemistry & Biochemistry University of Texas at Austin
  396. Robert E. Tribble Professor of Physics Texas A&M University
  397. Gordon Mutchler Professor of Physics Rice University
  398. Daniel R. Spiegel, Professor Department of Physics and Astronomy Trinity University
  399. Jean George, PhD President and Owner Open Sky Software, Inc.
  400. Lowell Wood Department of Physics University of Houston
  401. M. A. K. Lodhi, Professor Department of Physics Texas Tech University
  402. Elena Montalvo Valley Research Corporation
  403. Daniel J. Heinzen Professor of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  404. Duane A. Dicus Professor, Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  405. Prof. Eric R. Bittner Department of Chemistry University of Houston
  406. Ayan Guha Postdoctoral researcher Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  407. Prof. Philip L. Varghese Stanley P. Finch Centennial Professorship in Engineering Director, Center for Aeromechanics Research University of Texas at Austin
  408. Muhammad I. Bhatti University of Texas Pan American
  409. Heather C. Galloway Department of Physics Texas State University - San Marcos
  410. Li Gao, PhD Research Department Halliburton Energy Services
  411. Dr. Bruce Miller Texas Christian University Brian Cooper, Ph.D. Geology Program Coordinator Department of Geography and Geology Sam Houston State University
  412. Pascal Mickelson Rice University Professor Arun Mitra, ret. Mathematics and Statistics Texas Tech university
  413. Dr. Wiley Kirk Electrical Engineering Dept University of Texas at Arlington
  414. Frederick J. Kontur Physics and Astronomy Rice University
  415. Dr. P. Mark Henrichs Consultant
  416. Tom Aton, PhD BA, Physics, Rice University, 1970 TI Fellow, Texas Instruments
  417. Surbhi Lal Rice University
  418. Prof. Mark Holtz Physics Texas Tech University
  419. Dr. Paul Chu University of Houston
  420. Dr. Rand L. Watson Professor of Chemistry Texas A&M University
  421. Dennis R. Ruez, Jr. University of Texas at Austin
  422. Elia Benitez-Marquez Environmental Science and Engineering University of Texas at El Paso
  423. Thomas E. Macrini Department of Geological Sciences University of Texas at Austin
  424. Eric G. Ekdale Department of Geological Sciences University of Texas at Austin
  425. Doug Campbell University of North Texas
  426. Shahnoor Habib University of Texas at Arlington
  427. Heather Appleby Department of Physics University of North Texas
  428. Jose Ricardo Correa University of North Texas
  429. Shivakumar Jolad Department of Physics Texas A&M University
  430. Becky Glynn Retired fifth grade teacher University of Texas at San Antonio
  431. Dr. Geary Eppley Staff Scientist Rice University
  432. Philip Smith Femtosecond Spectroscopy Group University of Texas at Austin
  433. Manish Mithaiwala Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  434. Raymond Scurek Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin Finch University of Health Sciences
  435. Laura Feeney University of Texas at Austin
  436. Nathan Harrison Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  437. Bryan Benaway Physics University of Texas at Austin
  438. Denis Langlais Tecmag
  439. David L. Andrews Rice University
  440. Martin Bitner Department of Astronomy University of Texas at Austin
  441. Dr. Mark Lewis Trinity University
  442. Dr. Ed Vinson Chemplex, LLC Kevin Burke Dept of Geosciences University of Houston
  443. Walter S. Kiefer Staff Scientist Lunar and Planetary Institute
  444. Mr. Brian G. Hanks Blinn College Division of Natural Science
  445. Dr. Douglas Biggs Professor, Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University
  446. Dr. Amanda Palmer Julson Division of Natural Sciences Blinn College
  447. Ray Conrow, Ph.D. Assistant Technical Director Chemical Preparations Research Alcon Research, Ltd.
  448. Akhtar H. Mahmood Assistant Professor University of Texas - Pan American
  449. Dr. Karen K. Vardanyan Department of Physics and Astronomy Trinity University
  450. Kevin M. Curtin, Ph.D. Assistant Professor - Geographic Information Science School of Social Sciences University of Texas at Dallas
  451. Karen Huxtable-Jester, Ph.D. Adjunct Lecturer, Psychology University of Texas at Dallas
  452. Padmakumar Nair, Ph.D., D.Sc., MBA Organization, Strategy and International Management School of Management
  453. Dr. Scott E. Robinson School of Social Sciences University of Texas at Dallas
  454. Larry Reitzer Professor Department of Molecular and Cell Biology University of Texas at Dallas
  455. Iftikhar Ahmad Texas Tech University J.C. ‘Buck’ Field, PMP, MCP, CPM Dimensional Topology, American Physical Society Independent Consultant Field Operative Information Systems Project Management
  456. James C. Thompson University of Texas at Austin and a Native Texan
  457. James L. Allen, PhD The Boeing Company International Space Station Program
  458. Anne Gillis, Ph.D. Department of Physics The Victoria College
  459. Francesco Stefani Institute for Advanced Technology University of Texas at Austin
  460. Spurgeon E. Smith (ret.) Former director of research for TRACOR, Inc.
  461. Scott J. Levinson, Ph. D. Research Engineer/Scientist Assoc. V Institute for Advanced Technology University of Texas at Austin
  462. Frederic Mikulec, Ph.D. Visiting Scholar Dept. of Chemical Engineering University of Texas at Austin
  463. Rollie Schafer Professor of Biological Science University of North Texas
  464. Glen Dillow, Ph.D. Alcon Laboratories
  465. Hossain Baghaei, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Dept. of Experimental Diagnostic Imaging University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  466. Glenn Agnolet Professor, Physics Department Texas A&M University
  467. Eric J. Hooper Astronomy Department University of Texas at Austin
  468. Robert C. Dowler, Ph.D. Professor of Biology Angelo State University
  469. Rebecca C. Smyth Research Scientist Associate Bureau of Economic Geology University of Texas at Austin
  470. Mary Jo Richardson Interim Dean College of Geosciences Texas A&M University
  471. David Hillis Alfred W. Roark Centennial Professor Section of Integrative Biology University of Texas
  472. Pamela R. Owen, PhD Texas Memorial Museum The University of Texas at Austin
  473. Joshua M. Peschel Texas A&M University
  474. Wayne M. Ahr, Professor of Geology Certified Petroleum Geologist Department of Geology & Geophysics Texas A&M University
  475. Vincent M. Cassone, Ph.D. Professor and Head Department of Biology Texas A&M University
  476. David L. Carlson Anthropology Department Texas A&M University
  477. Shuying Yang Mechanical Engineering Department University of Texas Pan American
  478. Arvind Mahajan Lamar Savings Professor of Finance Texas A&M University
  479. James W. Erickson Associate Professor Department of Biology
  480. Texas A&M University Joachim Schambach Physics Department University of Texas
  481. Thomas D. McKnight Professor and Associate Head Department of Biology Texas A&M University
  482. Susan S. Golden Distinguished Professor Department of Biology Texas A&M University
  483. Ira F. Greenbaum, Professor Department of Biology Texas A&M University
  484. Dr. F. W .de Wette Professor Emeritus University of Texas at Austin
  485. James W. Golden Professor Department of Biology Texas A&M University
  486. Deborah A. Siegele, Ph.D. Associate Professor Dept of Biology Texas A&M University
  487. Enamul Huq Assistant Professor Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology University of Texas at Austin
  488. John M. Ivy, Ph.D. Department of Biology Texas A&M University
  489. Lawrence L. Espey, Ph.D. Cowles Distinguished Professor Department of Biology Trinity University
  490. Alan Lloyd, Ph.D. Associate Professor Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology The University of Texas at Austin
  491. Norman Schaeffer, Ph.D. retired physicist
  492. Robert H. Walker Professor Emeritus University of Houston
  493. Barbara Finlay Department of Sociology Texas A&M University
  494. Nick Brette Professor of Chemistry Collin County Community College
  495. Natsumi Matsuda Physics University of Texas at Austin
  496. Ry Young Professor Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas A&M University
  497. Dr. Bruce B. Riley Associate Professor Biology Department Texas A&M University
  498. Emily Hollister NASA Earth Systems Science Graduate Fellow Department of Rangeland Ecology and Management Texas A&M University
  499. Linda Stearns Math Teacher Bryan High School
  500. Jim Manhart Department of Biology Texas A&M University
  501. Janet Braam, Ph.D. Associate Professor Biochemistry and Cell Biology Rice University
  502. Jim Hu Associate Professor and Associate Head for Graduate Programs Dept. of Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas A&M University
  503. Kwong Lau Professor of Physics University of Houston
  504. C.O.Patterson Dept. of Biology Texas A&M University
  505. Radha Krishnan, PhD Computer Science Faculty University of Texas at Dallas
  506. Andrew Kuhs Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  507. Patricia LiWang Assoc. Prof. Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas A&M University
  508. Mary Bryk, PhD. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas A&M University
  509. Qimiao Si Department of Physics & Astronomy Rice University
  510. Dr. Sumana Datta Associate Professor Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas A&M University
  511. Merrill Sweet Professor emeritus Texas A&M University
  512. Elizabeth C. Berigan, M.D. Diplomate, American College of Physicians Assistant Clinical Professor, Texas A&M Health Science Center Senior Staff, Scott and White Clinic
  513. Timothy W. Sinor, Ph.D. Chief Scientist-Image Intensifier Tubes Northrop-Grumman EOS
  514. Andy C. LiWang Assistant Professor of Biochemistry & Biophysics Texas A&M University
  515. Jerry Tsai Assistant Professor of Biochemistry & Biophysics Texas A&M University
  516. Michael Polymenis, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas A&M University
  517. Edward A. Funkhouser Professor of Biochemistry Texas A&M University
  518. Lawrence J. Dangott, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics Texas A&M University
  519. J. Martyn Gunn Professor of Biochemistry Associate Head for Undergraduate Programs Texas A&M University
  520. Rosemarie Swanson Research Scientist Biochemistry & Biophysics Dept Texas A&M University
  521. Karl M. Koshlap, PhD Manager, Biomolecular NMR Laboratory Texas A&M University
  522. Bryant W. Miles Lecturer Texas A&M University
  523. Riki Kobayashi Louis Calder Professor Emeritus Department of Chemical Engineering Rice University Prof. C.
  524. Nick Pace Medical Biochemistry Department Texas A&M University Medical Center
  525. Geoffrey Kapler Associate Professor of Medical Biochemistry and Genetics Chair, Interdisciplinary Faculty of Genetics Texas A&M College of Medicine
  526. Alan E. Pepper Associate Professor Department of Biology Texas A&M University
  527. Dorothy Shippen Professor Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas A&M University
  528. Arthur M. Hobbs Professor Department of Mathematics Texas A&M University
  529. Herbert L. Berk Professor of Physics University of Texas at Austin
  530. J. Creighton Miller,Jr. Department of Horticultural Sciences Texas A&M University
  531. David L. Adelson, Ph.D. Associate Professor - Animal Genomics Dept. of Animal Science Texas A&M University
  532. Renée M. Tsolis, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Medical Microbiology & Immunology College of Medicine Texas A&M University Health Science Center
  533. Yiwei Jiang, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Medical Biochemistry & Genetics Texas A&M University System Health Science Center
  534. Dr. Thomas J. DeWitt, Assistant Professor Department of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences Texas A&M University
  535. Andreas J. Baumler, PhD Associate Professor Dept. Med. Microbiology. & Immunology Texas A&M University System Health Science Center
  536. Dr. Jean Gould Assistant Professor, Plant Cell Biology Director, Plant Transformation & Gene Expression Group Texas A&M University
  537. Niescja E. Turner Department of Physics University of Texas at El Paso
  538. Deborah Bell-Pedersen Associate Professor of Biology Texas A&M University
  539. Richard Gomer Howard Hughs Medical Institute Professor of Biochemistry Rice University
  540. Deborah T. Kochevar, DVM, PhD Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology Texas A&M University
  541. Daniel Ebbole Professor Department of Plant Pathology & Microbiology Texas A&M University
  542. Laurie A. Jaeger, DVM, PhD Texas A&M University Timothy C. Hall, Ph.D.
  543. Distinguished Professor of Biology at Texas A&M University
  544. Mimi Zebrick Lawrence Applied Research Laboratories, University of Texas at Austin
  545. Omar Vargas Physics and Astronomy Rice University
  546. Duane Buhrmester Professor of Psychology University of Texas at Dallas
  547. Larsson Omberg Physics Assistant Instructor University of Texas at Austin
  548. César Rodríguez Physics Department University of Texas at Austin
  549. Behrang H. Hamadani Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Rice University
  550. Martha Casquette University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College


This letter has been signed by scientists throughout the Texas science and technology enterprise including prominent researchers in major corporations, small businesses, and our research universities. Distinguished teachers in all levels of the Texas education system, including K-12, community colleges, colleges and universities, have signed.

Source: 550 Texas scientists and educators at NCSE


Texas Baylor: Intelligent design is NOT a science: Baylor




  1. Cliff Hamrick, Biology Department, Baylor University.
  2. Robert Baldridge, Professor of Biology, Baylor University.
  3. Richard Duhrkopf, Associate Professor of Biology, Baylor University.
  4. Lewis Barker, Professor of Psychology & Neuroscience, Baylor University.
  5. Wendy Sera, Assistant Professor of Biology, Baylor University.
  6. Darrell Vodopich, Associate Professor of Biology, Baylor University.
  7. Sharon Conry, Biology Department, Baylor University.
  8. Cathleen Early, Biology Department, Baylor University.
Source: Intelligent design is NOT a science


Professor at Baptist University calls intelligent design ‘dumb’
Dr Duhrkopf was quoted by the Associated Press (July 2) to say, "We want to get the word out that we in the biology department are unanimously opposed to this. People in intelligent design do not understand what science is."


  1. Dr Duhrkopf Biology Professor Baylor University



Washington


Washington Gonzala: Biology Department rejects intelligent design



On National Public Radio’s Talk of the Nation Science Friday program of November 19, GU Law Professor David DeWolf participated in a discussion on teaching intelligent design as an alternative to evolution. Although Professor DeWolf is on the faculty of Gonzaga University Law School, his views on intelligent design do not represent those of the University as a whole. In particular, the faculty of the Biology Department at Gonzaga are unanimous in their acceptance of evolutionary theory as a fundamental underlying tenet of the science of biology. The principles of evolution are as well-established as any other body of scientific knowledge, and a full and correct appreciation for those principles is necessary for understanding the nature of life. Intelligent design is not a scientific alternative to evolution. The flaws in the idea of intelligent design have been amply and publicly exposed, and the Biology Department feels that the teaching of intelligent design has no place in a science curriculum at any level.

For additional information on the issue of intelligent design vs. evolutionary theory, visit the National Center for Science Education.

Faculty includes:
  1. Kirk Anders, Assistant Professor Genetics and Evolution, Cell Biology
  2. Julie Beckstead, Assistant Professor Community Ecology
  3. Maria Bertagnolli, Associate Professor Diversity of Life, Cell Biology, Genetics and Evolution
  4. David Boose, Associate Professor Diversity of Life, Ecology, Advanced Evolution, Conservation Biology
  5. William Ettinger, Associate Professor Cell Biology, Genetics and Evolution, Plant Physiology, Molecular Biology, Intro Microbiology
  6. Joseph Haydock, Assistant Professor Diversity of Life, Ecology, Vertebrate Biology, Genetics and Evolution
  7. Hugh Lefcort, Professor Diversity of Life, Ecology, Parasitology, Behavioral Ecology
  8. Peter Pauw, Professor Cell Biology, Microbiology, Histology, Immunology
  9. Robert Prusch, Professor and Dean of Arts and Science Diversity of Life, Cell Biology, Advanced Cell Biology

  10. Nancy Staub, Professor and Chair Genetics and Evolution, Vertebrate Biology, Advanced Evolution

Source: Biology Department rejects intelligent design Gonzaga




Pennsylvania


Pennsylvania Dover: York College profs disturbed by Dover

We are extremely disappointed and concerned about the recent decision by the majority of members on the Dover Area School Board to make intelligent design an official and required component of their biology curriculum.
The inclusion of intelligent design in their curriculum as an "alternative" evolutionary theory reflects a genuine lack of knowledge about the data supporting evolution by natural selection.

It also reflects a profound misunderstanding of the scientific process, and an equally profound disregard for the science educators and students in the Dover School District.

Scientific research takes place on all continents and in most countries. Despite their cultural and religious diversity, scientists from all over the world share a common methodology.

Science works because there is a shared universal understanding of a scientific process that includes the following fundamental conventions.

*Scientists systematically collect and organize information about the natural world. In doing so, we look for recurring patterns and relationships among events and processes.

*Science probes the material world by using a repeatable and standardized methodology that makes no reference to supernatural or theistic influences. In the course of working on difficult research problems, scientists do not use concepts such as "designer" or "creator." Instead, we assemble a coherent view of nature by persistently applying the methods of science.

*Explanations ("hypotheses") in biology must be testable. The invoking of Intelligent Design as a hypothesis to explain natural phenomena has no merit among scientists since no test can be designed that would generate observations or data to support such a mechanism.

*Scientists attempt to construct theories that explain a large number of observed events. The theory of evolution by natural selection is the unifying theory of biology.

No theory in biology is more tested, appreciated, resilient, and explanatory than the theory of evolution by natural selection. And, scientists from a variety of disciplines have amassed an overwhelming collection of testable, reproducible, and observable data to unequivocally support this process.
The inclusion of intelligent design in any science curriculum as an "alternative" to evolution by natural selection is inappropriate. As educators, we urge the Dover Area School Board to review this disappointing decision, and include its own biology teachers in discussions concerning curricular issues. As scientists and educators, we urge the school board to exclude theism and the supernatural from its science curriculum.


  1. Tony Botyrius,M.S., Cornell University. Mr. Botyrius teaches the laboratory component in Biology I and II, Genetics, and Field Natural History. Mr. Botyrius also supervises secondary education biology student-teacher candidates. His research interest is plant ecology.
  2. Rod Waltemyer
  3. Ron Kaltreider, Ph.D., Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Kleiner teaches Ecology, Environmental Biology, Evolutionary Biology, Field Natural History, Senior Thesis, and Tropical Ecology. His research interests include plant-insect interactions, plant physiology, and forest ecology.
  4. Karl Kleiner,Ph.D., Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Kleiner teaches Ecology, Environmental Biology, Evolutionary Biology, Field Natural History, Senior Thesis, and Tropical Ecology. His research interests include plant-insect interactions, plant physiology, and forest ecology
  5. Carolyn Mathur, Ph.D., Auburn University. Dr. Mathur teaches Microbiology and Immunology. In 2003 she received a Summer Research Fellowship from the American Chemical Society/American Petroleum Institute to conduct geomicrobiological research on the availability of organic reserves in rocks to microbial degradation. She is collaborating with researchers at Penn State.
  6. Jessica Nolan, Ph.D., Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Dr. Nolan teaches Introduction to Oceanography and Marine Biology. Her research areas include the role of plankton in the oceanic carbon cycle, genetic and ecological diversity of picoeukaryotes in the coastal ocean, and the evolution of plankton lineages.
  7. Brad Rehnberg, Ph.D. Oregon State University. Dr. Rehnberg teaches Fundamentals of Human Biology, Animal Physiology, Animal Behavior, Introduction to Scientific Research, Senior Thesis, and Zoology. His research areas include sensory physiology and behavioral thermoregulation.
  8. Debbie Ricker, Ph.D., Johns Hopkins University. Dr. Ricker is the chairperson of the department. She teaches Biology I, Introduction to Scientific Research, Reproduction and Development, and Senior Thesis. She studies reproductive biology, with an emphasis on male fertility.
  9. Barbara Taylor, M.S., Towson State University. Mrs. Taylor teaches Fundamentals of Human Biology, Microbes: Unseen Life on Earth, and lab sections in Microbiology, Immunology, and Marine Biology.
  10. Jeffrey Thompson,Ph.D., Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine. Dr. Thompson teaches General Biology, Biology I, Biochemistry, and Senior Thesis. His cancer therapy research is based on developing targeted delivery of cytotoxic compounds that "seek and destroy" cancer cells.

MEMBERS OF YORK COLLEGE BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT
Source: York College profs disturbed by Dover


College biologists blast Dover York College faculty members said the 'intelligent design' decision goes against science.
Kleiner said two members of the department declined to sign the letter. Elizabeth Hodgson, a lab coordinator who teaches general biology, declined to comment on her reasons for not signing it. Bruce Smith, a biology and botany professor, could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

PENNSYLVANIA PARENTS FILE FIRST-EVER CHALLENGE TO 'INTELLIGENT DESIGN' INSTRUCTION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS



'Intelligent Design' Is Religious Argument, Not Science, Say Parents
HARRISBURG, PA-The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, Americans United for Separation of Church and State and attorneys with Pepper Hamilton LLP filed a federal lawsuit today on behalf of 11 parents who say that presenting "intelligent design" in public school science classrooms violates their religious liberty by promoting particular religious beliefs to their children under the guise of science education.

"Teaching students about religion's role in world history and culture is proper, but disguising a particular religious belief as science is not," said ACLU of Pennsylvania Legal Director Witold Walczak. "Intelligent design is a Trojan Horse for bringing religious creationism back into public school science classes."

The Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Americans United Executive Director, added, "Public schools are not Sunday schools, and we must resist any efforts to make them so. There is an evolving attack under way on sound science education, and the school board's action in Dover is part of that misguided crusade. 'Intelligent design' has about as much to do with science as reality television has to do with reality."
Source: ACLU


Ohio


Ohio Citizens for Science


* Website

Ohio: Case scientists oppose creationist lesson in school curriculum

Faculty support legislation restoring genuine science education to the state's public school curricula
Lawrence Krauss, chair and Ambrose Swasey Professor of physics at Case Western Reserve University, said the proposed curriculum includes thinly veiled creationism and hoped the governor would "come down on the side of good science."

"The people behind intelligent design creationism find science to be incompatible with belief in God," Krauss said. "That's not the case; most scientists do believe in God. The issue is this: Intelligent design is scientifically untestable. It's not science."


  1. Professeor Lawrence Krauss, chair and Ambrose Swasey Professor of physics
  2. Professor Patricia Princehouse
  3. Professeor Cynthia Beall, Case's Sarah Idell Pyle Professor of Anthropology

Case Western Reserve University
Source: Case scientists oppose creationist lesson in school curriculum
See also Case faculty vote to oppose Ohio's proposed evolution plan

Ohio Faculty Council Resolution on Guidelines for Teaching the Geological and Biological Sciences



Biological Sciences Adopted February 13, 2004

Regarding the reinstatement of proper teaching guidelines for the teaching of Geological and Biological Sciences

WHEREAS, it is a responsibility of the Ohio educators to present science and encourage scientific inquiry; and

WHEREAS, science is a systematic method of continuing investigation, based on observation, hypothesis testing, measurement, experimentation, and theory building, which leads to more adequate explanations of natural phenomena, explanations that are open to further testing, revision, and falsification, and while not “believed in” through faith may be accepted or rejected on the basis of evidence; and

WHEREAS, the theory of evolution, as presently developed, fully satisfies these criteria, especially when its teaching considers the remaining debates concerning its detailed mechanisms; and

WHEREAS, a recent decision by the State Board of Education establishes a module for the “critical assessment of evolution,” which simultaneously attacks the theory itself and facilitates the introduction of pseudo-scientific approaches such as “Creationism” or “Intelligent Design,” which have no scientific validity,

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Ohio Faculty Council supports legislation reversing the State Board’s decision and restoring genuine science education to the state’s public school curricula, and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Ohio Faculty Council urges citizens, educational authorities, and legislators to oppose any alteration of the science curriculum or state proficiency tests in science that would in any way accommodate approaches based on either religious beliefs or other sources that are not amenable to the scientific process of scrutiny, testing, and revision.

Ohio Faculty Council members include:

  1. Bowling Green State University
  2. Central State University
  3. Cleveland State University
  4. Kent State University
  5. Medical College of Ohio at Toledo
  6. Miami University
  7. Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine
  8. The Ohio State University
  9. Ohio University
  10. Shawnee State University
  11. University of Akron
  12. University of Cincinnati
  13. University of Toledo
  14. Wright State University
  15. Youngstown State University


Source: Ohio Faculty Council Resolution on Guidelines for Teaching the Geological and Biological Sciences


Ohio University Presidents Oppose Intelligent Design



While we recognize the great value of spirituality and faith in today's society, we urge you to reject the concept of intelligent design creationism as a part of the science curriculum. We also request that you establish the foundation for a preeminent science curriculum in Ohio dedicated to rigorous testing and experimentation, strengthened with thorough teaching of evolution in our science requirements.


  1. Robert Glidden President, Ohio University Chair, Inter-University Council
    On behalf of IUC presidents:

  2. Luis Proenza, University of Akron
  3. Sidney Ribeau, Bowling Green State University
  4. John Garland, Central State University
  5. Joseph Steger, University of Cincinnati
  6. Michael Schwartz, Cleveland State University
  7. Carol Cartwright, Kent State University
  8. Frank McCullough, Medical College of Ohio
  9. James Garland, Miami University
  10. Robert Blacklow, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine
  11. William Kirwan, Ohio State University
  12. Michael Field, Shawnee State University
  13. Daniel Johnson, University of Toledo
  14. Kim Goldenberg, Wright State University
  15. Daniel Sweet, Youngstown State University


Source: Ohio University Presidents Oppose Intelligent Design

CWRU faculty report findings on evolution, intelligent design poll of Ohio's scientists



For immediate release: October 4, 2002

CLEVELAND—Nine out of 10 Ohio scientists from secular and religious colleges and universities responding to a survey say that intelligent design is primarily a religious view and not part of science. Case Western Reserve University faculty reported on the findings of the Internet poll during a news conference October 10.
*Nine out of 10 scientists (91 percent) felt the concept of intelligent design was unscientific and the same number responded that it was a religious view
*A vast majority (93 percent) of the scientists were not aware of "any scientifically valid evidence or an alternate scientific theory that challenges the fundamental principles of the theory of evolution"
*Almost all scientists (97 percent) said they did not use the intelligent design concept in their research
*Ninety percent of the responding scientists stated that they felt no scientific evidence supports intelligent design, while 2 percent were unsure
*Approximately 7 percent felt that intelligent design had some support from scientific evidence
*Some 84 percent felt acceptance of the evolution theory was "consistent with believing in God
Source: CWRU faculty report findings on evolution, intelligent design poll of Ohio's scientists

The American Society for Cell Biology

NATIONAL OFFICE: 8120 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 750 Bethesda Maryland 20814-2762
TEL: (301) 347-9300 FAX (301) 347-9310 E-MAIL ascbinfo@ascb.org www.ascb.org
March 6, 2002


We write on behalf of the American Society for Cell Biology, a non-profit professional society of 10,000 basic biomedical research scientists in academia, industry, and government laboratories throughout the United States and the world. About 200 ASCB members are Ohioans.

We were pleased by the Ohio State Board of Education's decision to solicit an outside review of state science curriculum from educators and scientists. As scientists, we concur with the panel's recommendations that the teaching of the theory of evolution be part of the state curriculum guidelines, because we believe that a basic science education without a firm grounding in evolutionary
concepts would leave the student ill-prepared for further study or a career in the life sciences.

For this reason, we are appalled by recent attempts to inject the teaching of "Intelligent Design" into Ohio science curriculum guidelines. "Intelligent Design" is nothing but thinly veiled "Creationism." It is not a scientific theory but a matter of faith, and it does not belong in a science curriculum. Darwin's theory of natural selection is a central unifying concept in modern biology. It enables scientists to explore and understand natural processes from ecology to molecular and cellular biology. Imposing the doctrine of "Intelligent Design" in the science classroom will compromise students' understanding of
modern biology and leave them with devalued academic credentials. Justifying the teaching of "Intelligent Design" to Ohio's science students with an equal-time argument is foolish.

This is also an issue for Ohio's economic future. The American Society for Cell Biology calls upon Ohio's educational leaders to work with Governor Taft in his initiative to foster high-tech and biotech industry in the state. Promoting "Intelligent Design" in science classrooms would undermine Ohio's scientific
credibility, tarnish its reputation in the global scientific community, and compromise the state's ability to attract scientists and scientific entrepreneurs.

We urge the State Board of Education to avoid this divisive, counterproductive, and ultimately pointless controversy. Evolutionary theory has an immense impact on everything from controlling antibiotic resistance to treating cancer, and provides a platform that helps scientists understand
diseases such as diabetes, Alzheimer's, and congestive heart failure. If the Ohio State Board of Education opens the doors of our science classrooms to theology, the uproar will only get louder and louder, damaging Ohio's reputation, its economy, and most of all, its children.

Respectfully,

Paul Berg, Ph.D. Cahill Professor of Cancer Research & Biochemistry,
Emeritus Director Emeritus, Beckman Center for Molecular & Genetic Medicine
Stanford University School of Medicine Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1980 Chair, The
ASCB Public Policy Committee

Tom Egelhoff, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Physiology & Biophysics Case
Western Reserve School of Medicine Member, The ASCB Public Information
Committee




Missouri


Scientists and Educators for Quality Science Education


More than 450 Missouri scientists and educators have endorsed a statement (see below) opposing the teaching of "intelligent design," a form of creationism, in public school science classes. Intelligent design is the idea that the biological world is so complex that it can only be explained by reference to a "designer," not necessarily a divine being. Missouri House Bill 911, filed by Rep. Robert Wayne Cooper of Camdenton, would mandate equal treatment for intelligent design alongside biological evolution in public elementary and secondary schools, including classes in "Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Health, Physiology, Genetics, Astronomy, Cosmology, Geology, Paleontology, Anthropology, Ecology, and Climatology."


The Statement



Let's Teach Science in Science Classes



Missouri House Bill 911 wants to change the Education statutes to mandate the teaching of "intelligent design" creationism alongside Darwinian evolution in public school science classes. Missourians of all persuasions should reject this attempt to force non-science into the science curriculum.

Proponents of Intelligent Design advertise it as an "alternative" to biological evolution. Advocates of HB911 frame their argument in terms of fairness, pointing out that it is necessary to teach all sides of a controversy. If the controversy about Darwinian evolution vs. Intelligent Design were truly scientific, we would enthusiastically support its inclusion in the curriculum. As educators, we know that one of the best ways to engage students in studying science is to present them with an unsolved problem. Look at how the current search for evidence of past life on Mars excites students at all levels.

Intelligent Design, however, isn't science. The characteristics of science that are accepted in U.S. law derive from a 1982 court decision, McLean vs Arkansas Board of Education.

:[T]he essential characteristics of science are:
:(1) It is guided by natural physical or biological law;
:(2) It has to be explanatory by reference to natural law;
:(3) It is testable against the empirical world;
:(4) Its conclusions are tentative, i.e. are not necessarily the final word; and
:(5) It is falsifiable or, more accurately, makes predictions that can be tested by observation

Intelligent Design doesn't meet these tests because it is a philosophical or theological perspective, not a scientific one. The Intelligent Design movement was started by a Berkeley law professor, Phillip Johnson. As Johnson's own writings assert, anti-evolution is a "wedge" to get religious "values" inserted into the public school curriculum. Thus, the motivation behind Intelligent Design has nothing to do with advancing science.

Even without considering their motives, Intelligent Design proponents haven't shown that there is anything in it that meets the criteria for being judged as science. Intelligent Design advocates presuppose the existence of a Designer and then try to debunk existing data; science works the other way around. The Designer explicitly does not follow the known processes of physics or chemistry so it isn't guided by, nor can it explain things by referring to physical or biological law. Intelligent Design fails to make predictions that we can test by observation or experiment. What if we found alien bacterial life on the moons of Jupiter? Would that be evidence for or against multiple instances of Design?

The court left out the final, and for scientists, definitive, test of whether something is science or not. An idea is judged first by whether it leads to new experiments or observations that make sense in light of the idea. Any theory or hypothesis, no matter how attractive, is discarded if it doesn't prove useful in this sense. Johnson started his wedge strategy over a dozen years ago, and the Intelligent Design advocates have published numerous books, position papers, essays and so on. In all that output, however, there has not been a single peer-reviewed paper in a scientific journal that uses Intelligent Design as a guide to a new experimental result or observation. To the contrary, a number of claims made by the Intelligent Design advocates have been tested scientifically - and they haven't held up. We are forced to conclude that Intelligent Design, despite all the publicity, hasn't contributed anything to the physical or biological sciences and therefore has no place ! in the public school science classroom.

By contrast, evolution through natural selection has been tested ever since Darwin proposed it. Its principles and predictions fit with our observations of the contemporary and ancient natural world. We see examples of natural selection operating at molecular, organismal and species levels at the present time. Practically, we use evolution every day: to help select drug molecules, to follow the development of new species, to explore Earth and other planets, to develop new computer algorithms and to understand the human genome. It remains a vital and exciting area of science.

Missourians are working to build Life Sciences for the economic development of our state. We hope to discover new crops to feed the world, new medicines to comfort our lives and new materials that are more efficient and environmentally friendly than what we have now. Our state has important advantages in this effort: a central location, commitment and cooperation across the region, and strong educational institutions. Let's not throw these advantages away by undermining the science education of our young people. After all, we expect them to lead the way.

Endorsers


(Affiliations listed for identification purposes only)

Public Institutions



University of Missouri-Columbia (116)



  1. Sandra Abell
  2. John Adams
  3. Jim Allen
  4. Lloyd Barrow
  5. Karen Bennett
  6. Robert Blake (emeritus)
  7. Sarah Bush
  8. Michael Calcutt
  9. John Cannon
  10. James Carrel
  11. Anand Chandresekar
  12. Linda Chapman
  13. Gordon Christensen
  14. Edward Coe
  15. Leah Cohn
  16. Karen Cone
  17. Deborah Cunningham
  18. Bruce Cutter
  19. John David
  20. Joshua A. Deily
  21. Christopher Duncan
  22. John Dwyer
  23. David Eide
  24. Janice Faaborg
  25. John Faaborg
  26. Mark Flinn
  27. William Folk
  28. Leonard Forte
  29. Craig Franklin
  30. Patricia Friedrichsen
  31. Shari Freyermuth
  32. Kevin Fritsche
  33. Candace Galen
  34. Clark Gantzer
  35. Peter Gardner
  36. Walter Gassman
  37. Jennifer C. Geib
  38. Miriam Golomb
  39. Noah Gordon
  40. Jennifer Graham
  41. Thomas Guilfoyle
  42. Richard Guyette
  43. Gretchen Hagen
  44. Allen W. Hahn
  45. Calvin Hale
  46. Michael Harmata
  47. Gerald Hazelbauer
  48. Ann D. Havey
  49. Tim Holtsford
  50. Sarah C. Humfeld
  51. TC Hwang
  52. Philip J. Johnson
  53. Jack Jones
  54. Robert Karoly
  55. Marc Linit
  56. Robert Livingston
  57. Sudarshan Loyalka
  58. Dennis Lubahn
  59. Alan Luger
  60. R. Lee Lyman
  61. Ruth MacDonald
  62. Robin Hurst-March
  63. Kelly Maynard
  64. Thomas Mawhinney
  65. Bruce McClure
  66. Matthew McClure
  67. John McCormick
  68. Mark McIntosh
  69. Gabe McNett
  70. Chris Merkord
  71. Jan Miernyk
  72. Joshua Millspaugh
  73. Rose-Marie Muzika
  74. Stephen Nothwehr
  75. Dennis O'Brien
  76. Beryl Ortwerth
  77. Deborah Pearsall
  78. Philip Peters
  79. Tom Philips
  80. Joseph Polacco
  81. M. Shane Pruett
  82. Linda Randall
  83. Chada Reddy
  84. Tracy Rittenhouse
  85. Mitch Rosenholtz
  86. Michael Roveto
  87. Ralph Rowlett
  88. Leona Rubin
  89. Lisa Sattenspiel
  90. Thomas Scanlon
  91. K. L. Schaffer
  92. Frank Schmidt
  93. Johannes Schul
  94. Dennis Sentilles
  95. Kevin L. Shelton
  96. Stacy Small
  97. George Smith
  98. Gary Stacey
  99. Matthew Struckhoff
  100. Jack Tanner
  101. Jay Thelen
  102. Kathy Timms
  103. Randall Tindall
  104. Michael Underwood
  105. Alber Vogt (emeritus)
  106. Mark Volkmann
  107. Reed Wadley
  108. Judy Wall
  109. Carol Ward
  110. Jan Weaver
  111. Daniel Wescott
  112. Carol Wicks
  113. Lee Wilkins
  114. W. Raymond Wood
  115. David Worcester
  116. Mark Yates
  117. Steven Young



University of Missouri-Kansas City (16)



  1. Keith M. Ashman
  2. Deendayal Dinakarpandian
  3. Leonard Dobens
  4. Michael Ferrari
  5. Saul Honigberg
  6. Orisa J. Igwe
  7. Douglas J. Law
  8. Appie Van de Liefvoort
  9. Lee Likens
  10. Anthony Persechini
  11. Jerry P. Place
  12. Peter Rogan
  13. Thomas Schuman
  14. Ann Smith
  15. Jakob Waterborg
  16. Karen Williams



University of Missouri-Rolla (30)



  1. Ralph Alexander
  2. Ron Bieniek
  3. Frank D. Blum
  4. Robert Dubois
  5. Ron Frank
  6. Leslie Gertsch
  7. Jay M. Gregg
  8. Barbara Hale
  9. John Hogan
  10. David E. Hoiness
  11. Robert Laudon
  12. Paula M. Lutz
  13. Don Madison
  14. Anne Maglia
  15. Melanie Mormile
  16. Dev Niyogi
  17. Tonya Numbere
  18. Francisca Oboh-Ikuenobe
  19. Paul Parris
  20. Barbara Patterson (emeritus)
  21. Gary Patterson
  22. John L. Schmitt
  23. Michael Schulz
  24. Ekkehard Sinn
  25. Agnes Vojta
  26. Thomas Vojta
  27. Dave Westenberg
  28. Gerald Wilemski
  29. Terry Wilson
  30. David J. Wronkiewicz



University of Missouri-St. Louis (8)




  1. Carol M. Bourne
  2. Charles Granger
  3. Robert Marquis
  4. Colin McDiarmid
  5. Patricia Parker
  6. Zuleyma Tang-Martinez
  7. Marc Spingola
  8. James Trager



Central Missouri State University (14)




  1. Aaron Alford
  2. Ruth S. Burkett
  3. Stefan Cairns
  4. Kurt Dean
  5. Richard Frazier
  6. John Gole
  7. John B. Hess (emeritus)
  8. Steve Mills (emeritus)
  9. Steve Mohler
  10. Selene Nikaido
  11. Jay Raveill
  12. John Sheets
  13. Frank Ray Voorhees
  14. Stephen Wilson



Harris-Stowe State College (1)



  1. Terry F. Werner



Lincoln University (2)



  1. Jim Borgwald
  2. Mike Scott



Missouri Western State College(1)



  1. David C. Ashley




Northwest Missouri State University (12)



  1. Gregg Dieringer
  2. David A. Easterla
  3. Barrett Eichler
  4. Kurt A. Ken Jones
  5. Haberyan
  6. Peter Kondrashov
  7. Patricia Lucido
  8. Phillip J. Lucido
  9. Janette Padgitt
  10. Karen L. Schaffer
  11. John Shaw
  12. Jeff Thornsberry



St. Louis Community College (1)



  1. George Heth



Southeast Missouri State (20)



  1. Allan J. Bornstein
  2. James E. Champine
  3. Philip W. Crawford
  4. Gary J. Cwick
  5. Bill Eddleman
  6. Allen Gathman
  7. Hamner Hill
  8. Alan Journet
  9. Timothy M. Judd
  10. James M. Knapp
  11. Karen A. Lawrence
  12. Walt W. Lilly
  13. Cara Lunn
  14. Rosemarie Mier
  15. Carol Morrow
  16. Steve Overmann
  17. John S. Scheibe
  18. David Starrett
  19. Nicholas Tibbs
  20. Steven N. Trautwein
  21. Margaret Waterman
  22. Diane L. Wood



Southwest Missouri State University (46)



  1. Douglas P. Aubrey
  2. M. Christopher Barnhart
  3. Daniel W. Beckman
  4. Richard N. Biagioni
  5. Michelle Bowe
  6. Justin Boyles
  7. Bryan E. Breyfogle
  8. Pam Brown
  9. William J. Burling
  10. Adam Crane
  11. Dean Cuebas
  12. Bradley J. Fisher
  13. Mark D. Given
  14. John Havel
  15. Charles W. Hedrick
  16. John S. Heywood
  17. Frank A. James
  18. Steven L. Jensen
  19. Robert P. Jones
  20. Brianna Kaiser
  21. Roy King
  22. Joe Martire
  23. Alicia Mathis
  24. Robert Mayanovic
  25. Mark L. McKnight
  26. Miranda Milam
  27. Thomas D. Moeglin
  28. Brad Mormann
  29. James Puckett
  30. Paul L. Redfearn Jr.
  31. Mark M. Richter
  32. Lynn W. Robbins
  33. Russell G. Rhodes
  34. Georgianna Saunders
  35. John G. Steiert
  36. John Strong
  37. Tina M. Tamme
  38. William E. Thomas
  39. Bob Thurman
  40. Tom Tomasi
  41. Anthony P. Toste
  42. Alexander Wait
  43. Yang Wang
  44. Robert J. Whitaker
  45. Nathan Windel
  46. George W. Wolf
  47. Jim Zimmerman



Truman State University (38)



  1. Michael J. Adams
  2. Dawood Afzal
  3. Matthew Beaky
  4. Dawn Beaulac
  5. Jon Beck
  6. Anne Bergey
  7. Michele Y. Breault
  8. Marijke Breuning
  9. Brent Buckner
  10. Scott Burt
  11. Mark Campbell
  12. David Christiansen
  13. Cynthia Cooper
  14. Maria C. Di Stefano
  15. Taner Edis
  16. Roger Festa
  17. Stephanie Fore
  18. Suren Fernando
  19. Alan Garvey
  20. Jon C. Gering
  21. Peter Goldman (emeritus)
  22. Rob Graber
  23. Wolfgang Hoeschele
  24. Elisabeth Hooper
  25. Michael Ira Kelrick
  26. Barbara Kramer
  27. Patrick Lobert
  28. Elaine McDuff
  29. Judith M. Misale
  30. Jeanne Mitchell
  31. Anne Moody
  32. Jeffrey M. Osborn
  33. Peter J. Ramberg
  34. Marc Rice
  35. David Robinson
  36. Peter Rolnick
  37. Pam Ryan
  38. Michael Seipel
  39. George Shinn
  40. Jeffrey R. Vittengl



Private Institutions



Central Methodist College (1)



  1. Paul Porneluzi



Culver-Stockton College(1)



  1. Joseph R. Coelho



Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine (6)



  1. Robert Baer
  2. Garrett Edwards
  3. Michael Lockwood
  4. Julia E. McNabb
  5. Philip C. Slocum
  6. Karen Snider
  7. Melissa Stuart



Rockhurst University (1)



  1. Chad Scholes



St. Louis University (15)



  1. Greg Comer
  2. Carmine Coscia
  3. David Crossley
  4. Vijai Dixit
  5. John Encarnacion
  6. Karen A. Gregerson
  7. John C. James
  8. Ronald T. Kellogg
  9. Mark Knuepfer
  10. Lacy Kolo
  11. Andy Lechner
  12. Heather Macarthur
  13. Brian J. Mitchell
  14. Jim Moore
  15. Larry M. Stacey
  16. William D. Thacker
  17. Peggy Weidman



Southwest Baptist University (1)

Mike Dickerson

Washington University, St. Louis (111)



  1. Joseph Ackerman
  2. Mark Alford
  3. Garland Allen
  4. Paul M. Allen
  5. Aaron DiAntonio
  6. Nathan Baker
  7. David C. Beebe
  8. Carl M. Bender
  9. Claude Bernard
  10. Stan Braude
  11. Michael Brent
  12. James H. Buckley
  13. Peter M. Burgers
  14. Jonathan Chase
  15. Roberto Civitelli
  16. Josephine E. Clark-Curtiss
  17. Barak Cohen
  18. Patricia Collin-Osdoby
  19. Jane Phillips-Conroy
  20. John Cooper
  21. Roy Curtiss III
  22. Willem H. Dickhoff
  23. Tamara Doering
  24. Sean Eddy
  25. Elliot Elson
  26. Timothy Fleming
  27. Carl Frieden
  28. Regina Frey
  29. Michael Friedlander
  30. Peter Gaspar
  31. Lev Gelb
  32. Patrick C. Gibbons
  33. Jeremy Gibson-Brown
  34. Alison Goate
  35. Edward Gogol
  36. Daniel Goldberg
  37. Ursula Goodenough
  38. Timothy Graubert
  39. Diana L. Gray
  40. Michael Gross
  41. Daniel F. Hanson
  42. Erik Herzog
  43. Thomas Hoerr
  44. Tim Holy
  45. Bradley Joliff
  46. T.J. Kappock
  47. Ken Kelton
  48. David Kirk
  49. Daniel Kohl
  50. Vjolica Konufca
  51. Rachel Kopan
  52. Robert Krantz
  53. Kristen Kroll
  54. Marilyn Krukowski
  55. Barbara Kunkel
  56. Harold L. Levin
  57. Petra Levin
  58. Walter Lewis
  59. Timothy Lohman
  60. Fanxin Long
  61. Jonathan Losos
  62. Elaine Mardis
  63. Charles W. Markman
  64. Garland Marshall
  65. Rebecca P. McAlister
  66. Kathryn Miller
  67. Kelle Moley
  68. Michael Mueckler
  69. Michael Neff
  70. Randall Odem
  71. Mike Ogilvie
  72. Karen O'Malley
  73. David Ornitz
  74. Himadri Pakrasi
  75. Rohit Pappu
  76. William C. Parks
  77. Marshall Alan Permutt
  78. Steve Peterson
  79. Roger J. Phillips
  80. Barbara Pickard
  81. Craig Pikaard
  82. Linda Pike
  83. Joel Price
  84. Ralph Quatrano
  85. Janet S. Rader
  86. Eric Richards
  87. Carmelo Romano
  88. John H. Russell
  89. J. Evan Sadler
  90. Meera Saxena
  91. Barbara Schall
  92. Stephen Scholnick
  93. James Schreiber
  94. Andrey S. Shaw
  95. Joshua Smith
  96. William Hayden Smith
  97. Jennifer Smith
  98. Erica Sonnenburg
  99. Thomas H. Steinberg
  100. Wai-Mo Suen
  101. Nobuo Suga
  102. Alan Templeton
  103. Douglas Tollefson
  104. Robert Tucker
  105. Thomas Vaid
  106. Herbert Virgin
  107. L. Lewis Wall
  108. Ralf Wessel
  109. Douglas Wiens
  110. Clifford M. Will
  111. Ernst Zinner



William Jewell College (7)



  1. Judith Dilts
  2. Stephanie Fiedler
  3. Dan Heruth
  4. Milton Horne
  5. Paul Klawinski
  6. Randall Morris
  7. Anne Nickel



Research Institutions



Donald Danforth Plant Science Research Center (2)



  1. Roger Beachy
  2. Jan Jaworski




Missouri Botanical Garden (2)



  1. Peter Hoch
  2. Peter Raven



Stowers Institute (5)



  1. James Coffman
  2. Joan W. Conaway Robb Krumlauf
  3. Linheng Li
  4. Arcady R. Mushegian



National Science Foundation - PRISM (1)



  1. Marilyn Rhea (Project Director)



Schools



Public School Teachers (5)



  1. Robin S. Hankinson (Cape Girardeau HS)
  2. Becky Litherland (Columbia Public Schools)
  3. Gary Midkiff (Farmington HS)
  4. Chris Reeves (School of the Osage HS)
  5. Carol Schatz (Holt HS)


Not included in the overall count - but still concerned

Parents and Citizens (10)




  1. Brian Beckmann
  2. Bill Boll (see website below)
  3. Kimberly Bordeaux (Inklings Creative)
  4. Alan Jacobs
  5. Dan Stefacek (parent)
  6. Mari Winn Taylor (Editor/Publisher The Joplin Independent)
  7. Bernard M. Ross (Senior at Lindenwood College)
  8. Janet I. Stanford (grandparent)
  9. Debra Sullentrup (Student at Truman State)
  10. Gene Woodford



Out of State Scientists and Educators(3)




  1. Stepen L. Timme (Pittsburg State University - KS)
  2. Marc Whitaker (Hillsdale Middle School - CA)
  3. Linda Hand (College of San Mateo - CA)


Source: Missouri Scientists and Educators for Quality Science Education


Missouri: Intelligent Design and the Missouri Standard Science Act (April 14, 2004)



WHEREAS, This bill has been introduced for consideration by the Missouri State legislature; and

WHEREAS, This bill proposes to require all primary and secondary schools to teach the proposed curriculum; and

WHEREAS, The Faculty of the University have authority for maintaining academic standards and for determining standards for admission to the University, and

WHEREAS, "Intelligent Design" has not been used as the basis for any contemporary peer reviewed scientific publication in the Biological or Physical Sciences and therefore does not meet the standards for accepted scientific knowledge, and

WHEREAS, the teaching of this material will displace accepted scientific knowledge and thereby interfere with students’ ability to meet requirements for admission to the University; therefore be it

RESOLVED, That HB 1722 should be rejected by the state legislature; and be it further

RESOLVED, That the Faculty Council requests the faculty governance bodies of other institutions of higher education in the State of Missouri to study this bill and join us in calling for rejection of this bill by the Missouri State legislature.

Faculty Council University of Missouri, Columbia
Source: Intelligent Design and the Missouri Standard Science Act (April 14, 2004)


Wisconsin


Wisconsin: Grantsburg


On Oct. 12, the Grantsburg school board passed a motion: "When theories of origin are taught, students will study various scientific models or theories of origin and identify the scientific data supporting each." This motion revised a policy first passed unanimously on June 28, "to direct our science department to teach all theories of origin."

Although 42 deans throughout the University of Wisconsin system on Oct. 18 urged the board to rescind the policy, and more than 300 faculty members in Wisconsin on Nov. 1 signed a second letter of protest, the board is so far obdurate.

Not coincidentally, the president of the school board, David Ahlquist, is a pastor at a local Baptist church, which has previously invited a "young-earth" creationist to speak.

The main problem is the mandate to study not just "scientific models" but "theories of origin."

Contact:

:Grantsburg Schools
:480 E James Ave
:Grantsburg WI 54840-7959
:715/463-5499
:fax 715/463-2534
:Dr. Joni Burgin, District Administrator jburg@grantsburg.k12.wi.us

School Board Member Email Addresses:

:David Ahlquist dahlquist@grantsburg.k12.wi.us
:David Dahlberg ddahlberg@grantsburg.k12.wi.us
:Christine Erickson cerickson@grantsburg.k12.wi.us
:Russell Erickson rerickson@grantsburg.k12.wi.us
:Cindy Jensen cjensen@grantsburg.k12.wi.us
:Eric McKinley emckinley@grantsburg.k12.wi.us
:James Sundquist jsundquist@grantsburg.k12.wi.us

You may also wish to send a letter or email to the Burnett County Sentinel, Box 397, Grantsburg WI 54840, fax 715/463-5138.

Wisconsin Grantsburg: Over 350 educators signed the following letter to the Grantsburg School board


As science teachers and members of the Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers (WSST), we are writing to you because we are concerned about the recent action the Grantsburg School Board has taken with respect to the teaching of evolution in the Grantsburg Schools. First, permit us to introduce ourselves. WSST was founded in 1958 and with a current membership of almost 2,000, we are the largest organization in Wisconsin devoted to the advancement of science education. Our purpose is to promote, support and improve science education in the state of Wisconsin by providing leadership, advocacy, and programs to enhance the teaching and learning of science. WSST is a chapter of the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), long a leader in science education nationally.

The motion recently adopted by the Grantsburg Board, “When theories of origin are taught, students will study various scientific models/theories of origins and identify the scientific data supporting each,” is, in our professional opinion, terribly misguided. To our knowledge, the only viable scientific theory in this area is the theory of evolution. Your motion, by its simple presence, implies that the Board believes that there are other, competing scientific theories. The fact that your motion is limited to “theories of origin” and not to the entirety of science, similarly suggests that the Board has something specific in mind with respect to the teaching of “origins.”

We encourage you to closely examine the NSTA position statement on The Teaching of Evolution. This statement can be viewed on the web at:

http://www.nsta.org/main/pdfs/PositionStatement_Evolution.pdf>

The statement says quite clearly that “evolution has not been emphasized in science curricula in a manner commensurate to its importance because of official policies, intimidation of science teachers, the general public’s misunderstanding of evolutionary theory, and a century of controversy. In addition, teachers are being pressured to introduce creationism, ‘creation science,’ and other nonscientific views, which are intended to weaken or eliminate the teaching of evolution.” The statement goes on to say that “evolution is a unifying concept for science,” and points out that “scientific disciplines with a historical component, such as astronomy, geology, biology, and anthropology, cannot be taught with integrity if evolution is not emphasized.”
With respect to “alternative” views, the statement says, “’Creation science’ is a religious effort to support special creationism through methods of science. Teachers are often pressured to include it or other related nonscientific views such as ‘abrupt appearance theory,’ ‘initial complexity theory,’ ‘arguments against evolution,’ or ‘intelligent design theory’ when they teach evolution. Scientific creationist claims have been discredited by the available scientific evidence. They have no empirical power to explain the natural world and its diverse phenomena. Instead, creationists seek out supposed anomalies among many existing theories and accepted facts. Furthermore, ‘creation science’ claims do not lead to new discoveries of scientific knowledge.”

We can well believe that you may have passed your motion in the belief that doing so would encourage critical thinking skills among your students. If this is the case, we believe your motion is wide of the mark because there is no way students can learn critical thinking skills when they are told that nonscientific material has an underlying scientific basis. Rather than introducing students to critical thinking skills, we believe that such instruction will simply confuse them about the very nature of science. Given the large number of vitally important scientific issues currently confronting our society, confusion of this sort cannot be in society’s best interest. Additionally, we fear that your students will simply not be able to effectively compete academically in college with students who have been exposed to high quality science instruction in high school.

Please remember that WSST is a non-partisan, non-political group whose sole interest lies in promoting high quality science instruction throughout Wisconsin. Our letter is intended to bring information to your attention about which we believe you may be unaware. Our hope is that you will rescind your motion and not interfere in the science curriculum.

Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. We hope to be hearing from you in the near future.

Source: To the Grantsburg School Board and #sign Sign this letter

Wisconsin Grantsburg: Wisconsin Academics Decry Move to Water Down Darwin, Science 2004 306: 1113


Wisconsin academics are rallying to reverse a decision last month by a local school board that would require students to "study various scientific models/theories of origins" rather than stick with Darwinian theory only.

The Grantsburg school board's action spurred Michael Zimmerman, dean of the College of Letters and Sciences at the University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, to organize a flurry of letter writing by hundreds of scientists and theologians from universities around the state as well as high school science teachers. "We want to send as a strong a message as we can," says Zimmerman. Although Wisconsin state standards mandate the teaching of evolution, the board contends that the district has a right to make the standards more "inclusive."
Source: Science -- 306 (5699): 1113b

and
On October 18, Zimmerman and 42 fellow deans sent a letter to the Grantsburg school board and superintendent of schools. The letter urged the school board to withdraw the policy and advised that "alternative theories" consist of misinformed, spurious attacks on evolution combined with misleading, simplistic versions of evolutionary theory. A second letter signed by over 300 biology and religious studies faculty from 43 institutions of higher learning, both public and private, from across Wisconsin was sent on November 1.

Source: NCSE link

Wisconsin Grantsburg: Pastors protest district policy Fri, Dec. 17, 2004


Pastors protest district policy

Letter says evolution, Bible can coexist

BY KEVIN HARTER

Pioneer Press
Nearly 200 Wisconsin clergy want school officials in Grantsburg, Wis., to ensure evolution remains at the center of scientific teaching in the schools.

The district drew criticism for approving a policy earlier this year calling for scientific theories and evidence other than evolution to be taught. It changed the policy earlier this month, explicitly ruling out teaching creationism and “intelligent design,” a theory that the universe is so complex that it must have been created by a higher power.

But the revised policy contained an expectation that students be able to explain “the scientific strengths and weaknesses of evolutionary theory.” Such language is “a standard creationist tactic,” according to a news release accompanying a letter signed by 188 pastors from Baptist, Catholic, Episcopal, Lutheran, Methodist and other churches.

The pastors want evolution to be treated “the same as all scientific theories” and not singled out for special scrutiny, said Michael Zimmerman, dean of the College of Letters and Science at the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh. Zimmerman organized the letter-writing effort, which he called unprecedented.

TEXT OF THE PASTORS' LETTER:



Mr. David Ahlquist

President

Board of Education

Grantsburg School District

Grantsburg, Wisconsin 54840
Dear Mr. Ahlquist,

"Within the community of Christian believers there are areas of dispute and disagreement, including the proper way to interpret Holy Scripture. While virtually all Christians take the Bible seriously and hold it to be authoritative in matters of faith and practice, the overwhelming majority do not read the Bible literally, as they would a science textbook. Many of the beloved stories found in the Bible — the Creation, Adam and Eve, Noah and the ark — convey timeless truths about God, human beings, and the proper relationship between Creator and creation expressed in the only form capable of transmitting these truths from generation to generation. Religious truth is of a different order from scientific truth. Its purpose is not to convey information but to transform hearts.

"We the undersigned, Christian clergy from many different traditions, believe that the timeless truths of the Bible and the discoveries of modern science may comfortably coexist. We believe that the theory of evolution is a foundational scientific truth, one that has stood up to rigorous scrutiny and upon which much of human knowledge and achievement rest. To reject this truth or to treat it as 'one theory among others' is to deliberately embrace scientific ignorance and transmit such ignorance to our children. We believe that among God's good gifts are human minds capable of critical thought and that the failure to fully employ this gift is a rejection of the will of our Creator. To argue that God's loving plan of salvation for humanity precludes the full employment of the God-given faculty of reason is to attempt to limit God, an act of hubris. We urge school board members to preserve the integrity of the science curriculum by affirming the teaching of the theory of evolution as a core component of human knowledge. We ask that science remain science and that religion remain religion, two very different, but complementary, forms of truth."

Source: Pastors protest district policy


Michigan


Michigan Citizens for Science



* Website

Issues


MCFS is currently working to defeat two pieces of legislation recently introduced into the Michigan House of Representatives (HB 4946 & 5005). Each of these bills would weaken the quality of science education in Michigan as well as introduce non-scientific and faith-based ideologies into the public classroom.


Anti-Evolution/> Intelligent Design Bill Introduced into Michigan House (HB 4946)
A bill introduced into the Michigan House would require all references to "evolution" and "how species change through time" in the science standards to be modified to indicate "that (evolution) is an unproven theory" by adding the phrase "All students will explain the competing theories of evolution and natural selection based on random mutation and the theory that life is the result of the purposeful, intelligent design of a Creator".
The bill would require that "In the science standards for middle and high school, all references to evolution and natural selection shall be modified to indicate that these are unproven theories by adding the phrase 'Describe how life may be the result of the purposeful, intelligent design of a Creator'."


HB 4705 from the 2001-2 legislative session has been reintroduced as HB 5005 in the current House. HB 5005 would require that "The teaching in a public school science class of the methodological naturalism hypothesis as an explanation for the origin and diversity of life shall not preclude also teaching the design hypothesis as an explanation for the origin and diversity of life." The bill states that "A public school official shall not censor or prohibit the teaching of the design hypothesis."
As used in this bill, "design hypothesis" is defined as "the theory (sic) that life and its diversity result from a combination of chance, necessity and design. Methodological naturalism is defined as "the theory that nature is all there is and that all phenomena, including living systems, result only from chance and necessity.

Source: Source

A Michigan Science Teachers Association Position Statement


Approved August 5, 2003

The Teaching of Evolution and Michigan House of Representatives Bills No. 4946 and No. 5005
In adopting the position statement of the National Science Teachers Association ( NSTA) (1997) regarding the teaching of evolution, The Michigan Science Teachers Association (MSTA) supports the position that evolution is a major unifying concept of science and should be included as part of K-College science frameworks and curricula. The MSTA recognizes that evolution has not been emphasized in science curricula in a manner commensurate to its importance because of official policies, intimidation of science teachers, the general public’s misunderstanding of evolutionary theory and a century of controversy. Furthermore, teachers are being pressured to introduce creationism, creation "science", and other nonscientific views, which are intended to weaken or eliminate the teaching of evolution.
In accordance of the Michigan State Board of Education’s March 10, 1982 resolution regarding the "Teaching of Religion and Creationism in Michigan Public Schools", the MSTA agrees with the position that the "...State Board of Education oppose the teaching, in public educational institutions, of any course in religion which is outside of the realm of a secular program of education and be it further resolved that the State Board of Education recommend that any school district currently teaching creationism or any course in religion in an attempt to indoctrinate toward any particular belief or disbelief cease and desist such teaching."
In recognition of the Michigan State Board of Education’s resolution on the teaching of evolution and the MSTA adoption of the NSTA position statement on teaching evolution, the Michigan Science Teachers Association advocates that HB 4946 & HB 5005 be removed from any further consideration by the House of Representatives.

Read more!